Author:
Ioannou Soula,Kouta Christiana,Andreou Angeliki
Abstract
Purpose
– Health promotion can fall into a victim blaming approach and put social pressure on particular students who could be marginalized due to their personal, economical, cultural, social or ethnic characteristics, for example, students who are obese, drug users or HIV carriers. The purpose of this paper is to present and discuss ways in which the design of the newly reformed Cyprus Health Education Curriculum (CHEC) attempted to protect learners from victim blaming.
Design/methodology/approach
– The paper describes and reflects on the learning objectives, teaching methods and teaching activities of the CHEC.
Findings
– The paper gives specific examples of how the design of the CHEC attempts to ensure that the curriculum does not promote victim blaming. It describes learning objectives, content, suggested teaching methods and activities from three thematic areas of the curriculum which are particularly susceptible to victim blaming: “food and health”, “emotional health” and “family planning, sexual and reproductive health”. It discusses how the design of the CHEC attempts to encourage educators to address the underlying social and environmental determinants of health and thus avoid stigmatization.
Practical implications
– The paper can be useful for curriculum designers and school educators. It describes how the design of a health education curriculum and health education lessons can refrain from burdening the individual with total personal responsibility for health behaviour and lifestyle.
Social implications
– Understanding and implementing the basic learning themes and objectives of the CHEC has social and community implications. It promotes collective responsibility, emphasizing a non-blaming and community approach. The design of the CHEC challenges the idea of free choice, acknowledges the social determinants of health and promotes students’ empowerment as active members of society.
Originality/value
– The originality of this paper lies in the description and reflection of the design of the first health education curriculum in Cyprus, which attempts to secure learners from victim blaming in its implementation. The aspects of the design of the CHEC described in this paper may be applicable to other European countries.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Education
Reference50 articles.
1. Burkhart, G.
(2011), “Environmental drug prevention in the EU. Why is it so unpopular?”,
Adicciones
, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 87-100.
2. Colquhoun, D.
,
Wright, N.
,
Pike, J.
and
Gatenby, L.
(2008), “Evaluation of eat well do well, Kingston upon Hull’s school meal initiative”, available at: www2.hull.ac.uk/IFL/pdf/IFL-R_finalreport.pdf (accessed 21 January 2015).
3. Deschenes, M.
,
Martin, C.
and
Jomphe-Hill, A.
(2003), “Comprehensive approaches to school health promotion: how to achieve broader implementation”,
Health Promotion International
, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 387-396.
4. Educational Reform Committee
(2004), “Democratic and human education in European-Cypriot Community”, report of the Educational Reform Committee, Cyprus, available at: www.paideia.org.cy/upload/ekthesi_epitropis.pdf (accessed 22 January 2015).
5. Estacio, E.M.
and
Comings, J.
(2013), “Health literacy: exploring future directions and potential contributions from health”,
Journal of Health Psychology
, Vol. 18 No. 8, pp. 997-1003.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献