Author:
Kalita Anuska,Mondal Shinjini
Abstract
PurposeThe aim of this paper is to highlight the significance of integrated governance in bringing about community participation, improved service delivery, accountability of public systems and human resource rationalisation. It discusses the strategies of innovative institutional structures in translating such integration in the areas of public health and nutrition for poor communities.Design/methodology/approachThe paper draws on experience of initiating integrated governance through innovations in health and nutrition programming in the resource‐poor state of Chhattisgarh, India, at different levels of governance structures – hamlets, villages, clusters, blocks, districts and at the state. The study uses mixed methods – i.e. document analysis, interviews, discussions and quantitative data from facilities surveys – to present a case study analyzing the process and outcome of integration.FindingsThe data indicate that integrated governance initiatives improved convergence between health and nutrition departments of the state at all levels. Also, innovative structures are important to implement the idea of integration, especially in contexts that do not have historical experience of such partnerships. Integration also contributed towards improved participation of communities in self‐governance, community monitoring of government programs, and therefore, better services.Practical implicationsAs governments across the world, especially in developing countries, struggle towards achieving better governance, integration can serve as a desirable process to address this. Integration can affect the decentralisation of power, inclusion, efficiency, accountability and improved service quality in government programs. The institutional structures detailed in this paper can provide models for replication in other similar contexts for translating and sustaining the idea of integrated governance.Originality/valueThis paper is one of the few to investigate innovative public institutions of a particularly vulnerable and poor region in India, and is unique in that it uses the lenses of governance and community mobilisation to explore this important, and under‐researched, topic.
Subject
Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference60 articles.
1. Appleby, N.J., Dunt, D., Southern, D.M. and Young, D. (1999), “General practice integration in Australia. Primary health services provider and consumer perceptions of barriers and solutions”, Australian Family Physician, Vol. 28, pp. 858‐63.
2. Baxter, C., Levin, R., Legaspi, M.M., Bailey, B.E. and Brown, C.L. (2002), “Community health center‐led networks: cooperating to compete”, Journal of Healthcare Management, Vol. 47, pp. 376‐88.
3. Bruner, C., Kunesh, L.G. and Knuth, R.A. (1992), “What does research say about interagency collaboration?”, available at: www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/stw esys/8agcycol.htm.
4. Coburn, A.F. (2001), “Models for integrating and managing acute and long‐term care services in rural areas”, Journal of Applied Gerontology, Vol. 20, pp. 386‐408.
5. Coddington, D.C. (2001), “Integrated healthcare is alive and well”, Frontiers of Health Services Management, Vol. 17, pp. 31‐40.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献