Understanding the effect of decentralisation on health services

Author:

Regmi Krishna,Naidoo Jennie,Greer Alan,Pilkington Paul

Abstract

PurposeDespite enormous progress in health globally, primary healthcare services in many developing countries are facing different challenges. Many studies have documented that decentralisation could be useful in supporting and developing health services closer to citizens. The purpose of this paper is to assess the effect of decentralisation on health services, and to draw general lessons which might help to develop appropriate strategies to improve health services in Nepal.Design/methodology/approachA mixed method was used, consisting of reviews of current literatures relevant to decentralisation and health performance, engaging with health service inputs‐outputs data between 2001 and 2007, and assessing the range of choices (management, finance and governance) available to local authorities using Bossert's “decision‐space approach”.FindingsDecentralisation in many countries, including Nepal, suggests a new form of service delivery.Originality/valueReview of the selected studies in triangulation with health services data has revealed that decentralisation in many cases has improved access to, utilisation of, and management of health services. The effects on other performance dimensions such as policy, equity, quality and service effectiveness are poorly investigated topics in the literature. The findings suggest that the successful implementation of decentralisation requires a broader context of institutional capacity building and resource management, and underlines the need for their consideration during implementation processes, and further investigation.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference112 articles.

1. Adhikari, D. (2006), Towards Local Democracy in Nepal, SPRING Centre, Faculty of Spatial Planning, University of Dortmund, Dortmund.

2. Amin, S., Das, J. and Goldstein, M. (2008), Are You Being Served? New Tools for Measuring Delivery, World Bank, Washington, DC.

3. Ayco, R.T. (2007), “Local good governance”, available at www.scribd.com/doc/12805819/Local‐Good‐Governance‐by‐Ramon‐T‐Ayco (accessed 12 April 2009).

4. Azfar, O., Kähkönen, S. and Meagher, P. (2000), “Conditions for effective decentralized governance: a synthesis of research findings”, working paper, December, The IRIS Centre, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.

5. Babar, T. and Haticher, J. (2004), “Health‐seeking behaviour and health service utilization in Pakistan: challenging the policy makers”, Journal of Public Health, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 49‐54.

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3