Author:
Wibowo Andreas,Alfen Hans Wilhelm
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to identify 30 government-led critical success factors (CSFs) from both the meso and micro levels in public-private partnership (PPP) infrastructure development, measured the importance of these factors, and evaluated the government performance within the Indonesian context.
Design/methodology/approach
– The authors used weighted gap analysis, the Mann-Whitney test, and the Holland and Copenhaver procedure to support the analysis.
Findings
– The agreement-adjusted mean scores suggest that the identified CSFs are essential, but that these CSFs underperform in Indonesia. The tests indicated that the gap between performance and importance was significant on both the individual and aggregate level, and no respondent-background bias was observed in the data sets.
Practical implications
– This paper provides valuable information for prospective international investors who might be interested in alternative PPP investment opportunities in Indonesia.
Originality/value
– This paper enriches the existing body of knowledge on Indonesia’s PPP activities. This is important as, despite the fact that Indonesia offers one of the largest opportunities in Asia for investment in the national infrastructure sector, studies on Indonesia’s PPPs are rarely reported in the literature. This paper also offers a simple, practical, and replicable approach with a sound theoretical basis that can assist governments in identifying and evaluating PPP-specific determinant factors under their control, as well as in measuring their performance on these factors.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference45 articles.
1. Absher, A.
,
Graefe, A.
and
Burns, R.
(2002), “A methodological comparison of customer service analysis techniques”, Proceeding of the 2002 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium, April 13-16, Bolton Landing, New York, NY, pp. 41-45.
2. Aziz, A.M.A.
(2007), “A survey of the payment mechanism for transportation DBFO projects in British Columbia”,
Construction Management and Economics
, Vol. 25 No. 5, pp. 529-543.
3. Berawi, M.A.
and
Susantono, B.
(2012), “Developing conceptual design of mega infrastructure project: creating innovation and added value”,
Value World
, Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 12-20.
4. Biemann, T.
,
Cole, M.S.
and
Voelpel, S.
(2012), “Within-group agreement: on the use (and misuse) of rwg and rwg(J) in leadership research and some best practice guidelines”,
The Leadership Quarterly
, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 66-80.
5. Brown, R.D.
and
Hauenstein, N.M.A.
(2005), “Interrater agreement reconsidered: an alternative to the rwg indices”,
Organizational Research Methods
, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 165-184.
Cited by
66 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献