Value through innovation in long‐term service delivery

Author:

Brewer Graham,Gajendran Thayaparan,Jefferies Marcus,McGeorge Denny,Rowlinson Steve,Dainty Andrew

Abstract

PurposePublic‐private partnerships (PPPs) and other innovative procurement mechanisms are frequently used to deliver both an asset and a public service over a protracted period. The value streams to the parties involved can be complex, but generally arise from the satisfactory provision of infrastructure that is fit for purpose throughout its life. This research aims to investigate the effectiveness of the facility management (FM) function in delivering long‐term value to both the client and consortium.Design/methodology/approachThis paper describes a case study of a PPP in Australia that delivered social infrastructure in multiple locations to a state government. Drawing upon multiple perspectives from within the consortium, it utilises inductive principles to identify the influences on value generation through innovation by the FM function.FindingsThe ability of an Australian FM contractor to provide value within a PPP context has been shown to reflect some of the attributes described in literature. However, the extent of innovation, especially in the design and construction phases, has been limited by organisational history and capability, and relational and contextual issues.Originality/valueThis research highlights a flaw in the rhetoric relating to PPP delivery, namely the disconnection between the asset delivery and service delivery phases, which stifles the consortium's capacity to innovate and maximise value. It reveals a set of influences that both resonate with the literature and plausibly explain the suboptimal performance of the FM function within an Australian PPP. By using highly iterative analysis leading to within‐case generalisability, it provides a robust basis for wider investigation of the problem.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management Science and Operations Research,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference41 articles.

1. Akintoye, A., Taylor, C. and Fitzgerald, E. (1998), “Risk analysis and management of private finance initiative projects”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 9‐21.

2. Ayers, I. and Braithwaite, J. (1992), Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate, Oxford University Press.

3. Babcock, R.R. (2002), Buildings, Vol. 96 No. 11, pp. 36‐39.

4. Barrett, P. (1995), Facilities Management Towards Best Practice, Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford.

5. Barrett, P. and Sutrisna, M. (2009), “Methodological strategies to gain insights into informality and emergence in construction project case studies”, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 27 No. 10, pp. 935‐948.

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3