Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to examine the impacts of spatial transformation in the Network Society on facilities management principles in the context of an interdisciplinary university campus.
Design/methodology/approach
– This study reports a holistic case study with eight embedded units in one interdisciplinary university campus in Finland through a business model approach.
Findings
– The findings propose that spatial development projects should be examined holistically on three facilitation layers, namely, social, physical and virtual, through five business model lenses of Offering, Customers, Revenue Streams, Resources, and Cost Structure. Based on the findings, four main business model types can be identified and distinguished mainly in terms of collaborating with different partners and supporting a different core task of the university.
Research limitations/implications
– The cases are highly context-dependent, and their business models are ever evolving, which is why the dynamics of the development processes should be studied in more detail. The types of business models differ fundamentally, which is why their evaluation criteria could be tailored accordingly.
Practical implications
– The results suggest that the spatial transformation requires multiple supporting processes and principles, expanding the roles of the campus managers: finding a balance between localization and globalization, and individualism and communalism; collaborating with internal and external parties; identifying potential grass root spatial development projects to be supported; and engaging users in their expertise. The strengthening impact of social facilitation is capable of opening new business opportunities.
Originality/value
– This study indicates that the spatial transformation is happening in practice and offers guidelines for dynamically reacting to it from the facilities management perspective.
Subject
Building and Construction,Architecture,Human Factors and Ergonomics
Reference79 articles.
1. Alexander, K.
and
Price, I.
(2012),
Managing Organizational Ecologies – Space, Management and Organization
, RIOT, New York, NY.
2. Appel-Meulenbroek, R.
,
Groenen, P.
and
Janssen, I.
(2011), “An end-user’s perspective on activity-based office concepts”,
Journal of Corporate Real Estate
, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 122-135, available at: www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1927568 (accessed 22 April 2014).
3. Baxter, P.
and
Jack, S.
(2008), “Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers”,
The Qualitative Report
, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 544-559, available at: www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR13-4/baxter.pdf (accessed 10 January 2014).
4. Benneworth, P.
,
Charles, D.
and
Madanipour, A.
(2010), “Building localized interactions between universities and cities through university spatial development”,
European Planning Studies
, Vol. 18 No. 10, pp. 1611-1629, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2010.504345 (accessed 16 June 2014).
5. Brainport
(2014), “Brainport region Eindhoven”, available at: www.brainport.nl/en/business (accessed 17 June 2014).
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献