Author:
Gürtler Marc,Paulsen Thomas
Abstract
Purpose
Empirical publications on the time series modeling and forecasting of electricity prices vary widely regarding the conditions, and the findings make it difficult to generalize results. Against this background, it is surprising that there is a lack of statistics-based literature reviews on the forecasting performance when comparing different models. The purpose of the present study is to fill this gap.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors conduct a comprehensive literature analysis from 2000 to 2015, covering 86 empirical studies on the time series modeling and forecasting of electricity spot prices. Various statistics are presented to characterize the empirical literature on electricity spot price modeling, and the forecasting performance of several model types and modifications is analyzed. The key issue of this study is to offer a comparison between different model types and modeling conditions regarding their forecasting performance, which is referred to as a quasi-meta-analysis, i.e. the analysis of analyses to achieve more general findings independent of the circumstances of single studies.
Findings
The authors find evidence that generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity models outperform their autoregressive–moving-average counterparts and that the consideration of explanatory variables improves forecasts.
Originality/value
To the best knowledge of the authors, this paper is the first to apply the methodology of meta-analyses in a literature review of the empirical forecasting literature on electricity spot markets.
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Energy
Reference112 articles.
1. Electricity price forecasting in deregulated markets: a review and evaluation;International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems,2009
2. Short term price forecasting in deregulated electricity markets;International Journal of Energy Sector Management,2009
3. Bernes, K. (1993), “A quasi meta-analysis of youth and career research methodologies”, Research Report, University of Calgary, Calgary.
4. Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity;Journal of Econometrics,1986
5. Bollerslev, T. (2009), “Glossary to ARCH (GARCH)”, working paper, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献