Author:
Nappi Ingrid,Eddial Hajar
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to draw on the field of real estate management to explore the cost of flex-offices as well as the corporate discourse toward it and to identify the possible gap between real estate directors' discourse and the real cost of flex-offices.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper follows the grounded theory approach. Three studies were conducted: 16 semi-structured interviews with real estate actors, categorization of internal corporate documents and a thorough content analysis of the press discourse.
Findings
There is a positive vision as well as a very optimistic outlook on the flex-office on the part of real estate actors and the press. This research shows that reality does not reflect the discourse as 12 hidden costs identified are not currently factored into costs when setting up a flex-office, which can distort the discourse and efficiency. It will be interesting to measure those hidden costs in future research so as to have an objective discourse and a better cost estimate when deploying this kind of workspace.
Originality/value
Contradict the widespread discourse about flex-offices by highlighting the hidden costs that should be taken into consideration to allow managers to make accurate estimates. Although these hidden costs may seem ancillary at first sight, they might have an impact on efficiency.
Subject
Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference62 articles.
1. Varieties of discourse: on the study of organizations through discourse analysis;Human Relations,2000
2. An end-user’s perspective on activity based office concepts;Journal of Corporate Real Estate,2011
3. Studying discourse processes in institutional contexts,2017
4. Considering corporate real estate and human resource factors in an integrated cost model;Journal of Corporate Real Estate,2003
5. No particular place to sit? Exploring the issues of the flexible office for HRM,2009
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献