Author:
Saelawong Tippatrai,Yomnak Torplus,Chaiwat Thanee,Poopunpanich Siwat,Sutuktis Charoen
Abstract
Purpose
This study evaluates the effect of transparency measures on public procurement efficiency, focusing on Thailand’s Infrastructure Transparency Initiative (CoST). This study aims to understand its impact on the country’s public infrastructure procurement practices.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper analyses Thailand’s government construction procurement data, focusing on budgetary savings and CoST process participation. Budgetary savings are this study dependent variable, while the main intervention variable is the adoption of the CoST data disclosure standard. This study uses multiple linear regression, fixed-effects model and propensity score matching with the logit model for a comprehensive analysis.
Findings
This study shows that using the CoST data disclosure leads to notable budget savings in Thai public construction procurement. With CoST’s introduction, the savings rose by Baht 9.6m, and even with added controls, the savings remained significant at around Baht 3.3m. The savings consistently stay near 5% across different models. The propensity score matching method confirms these results, consistent with factors such as open bidding and agency categorisation.
Research limitations/implications
This study might not capture all benefits, especially non-financial ones. Thailand’s unique context and potential biases in data sources also need consideration.
Practical implications
CoST evidence backs Thailand’s procurement transparency. This study recommends broadening CoST, streamlining online platforms and promoting digital public engagement. Training stakeholders and partnering with state-owned enterprises and local agencies is vital to align with CoST and mitigate risks.
Originality/value
This study shows a clear link between transparency from information disclosure and budget efficiency in public procurement, using data from Thailand. It highlights the potential of transparency measures in developing countries.
Subject
Law,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference36 articles.
1. Lights on the shadows of public procurement: transparency as an antidote to corruption;Governance,2020
2. Blancas, L., Chioda, L., Cordella, T., Borges de Oliveira, A. and Vardy, F. (2011), “Do procurement rules impact infrastructure investment efficiency? An empirical analysis of inversão das fases in São Paulo state”, available at: https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/1813-9450-5528
3. Bohórquez, E. and Devrim, D. (Eds) (2012), “A new role for citizens in public procurement”, Citizens Markets, available at: www.cmi.no/publications/file/4868-civil-society-procurement-monitoring.pdf
4. CoST (2017), “CoST infrastructure data standard”, available at: https://infrastructuretransparency.org/resource/cost-infrastructure-data-standard/
5. Court efficiency and procurement performance;The Scandinavian Journal of Economics,2018