Transparency and budget savings in public procurement: evidence from Thailand’s Infrastructure Transparency Initiative (CoST)

Author:

Saelawong Tippatrai,Yomnak Torplus,Chaiwat Thanee,Poopunpanich Siwat,Sutuktis Charoen

Abstract

Purpose This study evaluates the effect of transparency measures on public procurement efficiency, focusing on Thailand’s Infrastructure Transparency Initiative (CoST). This study aims to understand its impact on the country’s public infrastructure procurement practices. Design/methodology/approach This paper analyses Thailand’s government construction procurement data, focusing on budgetary savings and CoST process participation. Budgetary savings are this study dependent variable, while the main intervention variable is the adoption of the CoST data disclosure standard. This study uses multiple linear regression, fixed-effects model and propensity score matching with the logit model for a comprehensive analysis. Findings This study shows that using the CoST data disclosure leads to notable budget savings in Thai public construction procurement. With CoST’s introduction, the savings rose by Baht 9.6m, and even with added controls, the savings remained significant at around Baht 3.3m. The savings consistently stay near 5% across different models. The propensity score matching method confirms these results, consistent with factors such as open bidding and agency categorisation. Research limitations/implications This study might not capture all benefits, especially non-financial ones. Thailand’s unique context and potential biases in data sources also need consideration. Practical implications CoST evidence backs Thailand’s procurement transparency. This study recommends broadening CoST, streamlining online platforms and promoting digital public engagement. Training stakeholders and partnering with state-owned enterprises and local agencies is vital to align with CoST and mitigate risks. Originality/value This study shows a clear link between transparency from information disclosure and budget efficiency in public procurement, using data from Thailand. It highlights the potential of transparency measures in developing countries.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Reference36 articles.

1. Lights on the shadows of public procurement: transparency as an antidote to corruption;Governance,2020

2. Blancas, L., Chioda, L., Cordella, T., Borges de Oliveira, A. and Vardy, F. (2011), “Do procurement rules impact infrastructure investment efficiency? An empirical analysis of inversão das fases in São Paulo state”, available at: https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/1813-9450-5528

3. Bohórquez, E. and Devrim, D. (Eds) (2012), “A new role for citizens in public procurement”, Citizens Markets, available at: www.cmi.no/publications/file/4868-civil-society-procurement-monitoring.pdf

4. CoST (2017), “CoST infrastructure data standard”, available at: https://infrastructuretransparency.org/resource/cost-infrastructure-data-standard/

5. Court efficiency and procurement performance;The Scandinavian Journal of Economics,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3