Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to evaluate the suspicious transaction reporting (STR) as a financial intelligence tool to identify the potential strengths and limitations of STR and to come up with the criteria, which will make this tool an effective one in early detection of terrorist financing activities.
Design/methodology/approach
Considering the research aim, this research uses the funnelling method for identifying effectiveness criteria. Funnelling is a method of literature review that helps find pertinent literature by refining the search through filtering the available research (Ridley, 2008). Using this method, the researcher first applied the criteria of actionable intelligence to filter the financial intelligence tools to select the most promising and important tool (suspicious transaction reporting) for early detection of terrorist financing activities. The funnelling method was also applied to derive the effectiveness criteria from the operational features, and corresponding limitations, of the suspicious transaction reporting system. The funnelling method was also used to identify those operational features and limitations of suspicious transaction reporting that have the most direct relevance to the early detection problem of suspicious transaction reporting.
Findings
There are some operational features of STR that give rise to certain limitations that undermine its effectiveness in terms of early detection of terrorist financing activities. The limitations of STR necessitate a search for criteria that will make STR effective in early detection of terrorist financing activities. Based on the operational features and their corresponding limitations, effectiveness criteria for STR have been derived in this study. It is shown how these effectiveness criteria can remove the limitations of STR.
Research limitations/implications
The list of operational features and the corresponding limitations based on which the effectiveness criteria have been derived may not be exhaustive. There may have other operational features, and corresponding limitations that also make STR largely ineffective in the early detection of terrorist financing activities, and for which more effectiveness criteria should also be derived.
Practical implications
The limitations and the effectiveness criteria will pave the way for redesigning STR in such a way that will make it highly useful for detecting financing activities relating to imminent terrorist attacks.
Social implications
The society will experience fewer terrorist attacks that will make the society peaceful, happy and vibrant.
Originality/value
In this study, the effectiveness criteria of STR for early detection of terrorist financing activities have been derived in an innovative way by deducing them from the operational features of STR and the corresponding limitations.
Subject
Law,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference67 articles.
1. Banking crime analysis and the effectiveness of banking supervision: combining game theory and the analytical network process approach;Buletin Ekonomi Moneter Dan Perbankan,2010
2. An analytical study of the financial intelligence units’ enforcement mechanisms;Journal of Money Laundering Control,2012
3. Amicelle, A. and Iafolla, V. (2017), “Reporting suspicion in Canada: insights from the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing”, TSAS Working Paper Series, 17-04, The Canadian Network for Research on Terrorism, Security and Society (TSAS), available at: www.tsas.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/2017-04-Amicelle.pdf
4. Preventing the financing of terrorism;Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law,2011