Knowledge work 2020: thinking ahead about knowledge work

Author:

Holtshouse Dan

Abstract

PurposeThis is the knowledge age and, to put it in Peter Drucker's language, knowledge workers and their knowledge are a vital component of this economy. Yet, so little is really known about these workers. New research is needed to better understand the issues surrounding the recruitment, productivity, deployment, and retention of these workers. This research aims to address this issue.Design/methodology/approachThe research was conducted through a 35‐part questionnaire administered in mid‐2008 to 125 business and government executives/professionals located in North America, Europe, and South America.FindingsThe research delineates two major work groups by age: 25 years old; and 26‐40 years old. The top two preference findings for 25‐year olds include: recruitment – flexi‐work and cultural diversity; retention – education/training and communities and networks; valued skills – team/collaboration and specialized technical; and technologies – collaboration tools and e‐mail, search, portals. The top two preference findings for 26‐40‐year olds include: recruitment – flexi‐work and job security; retention – communities and networks and documentation; valued skills – project management and strategic thinking; and technologies – collaboration tools and e‐mail, search, portals. Finally, measuring performance improvement metrics for these workers were: improved quality of output, task execution speed, and high‐impact innovation (as opposed to cost reduction and work elimination); innovation (25 years); and superior decision‐making/risk assessment capabilities (26‐40 years)Originality/valueThis field research provides a management framework for helping organizational leadership to make strategic decisions on how to build a more competitive and attractive workplace over the next ten years.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Education

Reference33 articles.

1. Alee, V. (1997), The Knowledge Evolution, Butterworth‐Heinemann, Newton, MA.

2. Calabrese, F.A. (2005), “The early pathways: theory to practice – a continuum”, in Stankosky, M. (Ed.), Creating the Discipline of Knowledge Management: The Latest in University Research, Elsevier, New York, NY, pp. 15‐50.

3. Davenport, T. and Prusak, L. (1998), Working Knowledge, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

4. Delio, M. (2000), “Grass roots are greener: knowledge initiatives advance from bottom‐up successes, not by executive fiat”, Knowledge Management, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 47‐50.

5. Drucker, P.F. (1992), Managing for the Future, Truman Talley Books, New York, NY.

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Implementation of 5S+S for Knowledge Work in Engineering Projects;Advances in Production Management Systems. Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable and Resilient Production Systems;2021

2. What matters for knowledge work productivity?;Employee Relations;2019-01-07

3. Analyzing the change in knowledge sharing efficiency of knowledge networks: a case study;Information Technology and Management;2018-11-21

4. A valid and applicable measurement method for knowledge worker productivity;International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management;2018-11-19

5. Lean approach in knowledge work;Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management;2018-05-18

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3