Abstract
PurposeThis paper examines whether the adoption of Japan’s Stewardship Code by institutional investors influences their preference for investee companies' governance quality. The Code, introduced by the Financial Services Agency in 2014, promotes constructive engagement between institutional investors and investee companies. Engagement with investees should improve institutional investors' ability to assess governance quality across their portfolios. The paper examines if this results in a positive relationship between the levels of Code-compliant institutional shareholding and investee governance quality.Design/methodology/approachThe association between Code-compliant institutional shareholding levels and a governance quality score is examined for Nikkei 500 companies.FindingsA positive association is observed between shareholdings by Code-compliant institutional investors and investee governance, with board independence playing a key role. Analysis shows that the association between institutional shareholding and governance is stronger for the Code-compliant shareholding than for overall institutional shareholdings. In addition, no significant relationship is found between the levels of shareholding by non-Code-compliant institutional investors and the governance quality score of investee companies. Taken together, the results suggest that Code adoption strengthens institutional investors' preference for high-quality investee governance.Originality/valueDespite the introduction of stewardship regulation worldwide, there is a scarcity of empirical research that examines its operation. The study contributes to the existing literature by providing insights into how compliance with stewardship regulation influences institutional investor decision-making.
Reference80 articles.
1. Foreign institutional investment: is governance quality at home important?;Journal of International Money and Finance,2013
2. The “Wall Street Walk” and shareholder activism: exit as a form of voice;Review of Financial Studies,2009
3. Differences in governance practices between U.S. and foreign firms: measurement, causes, and consequences;Review of Financial Studies,2009
4. Does governance travel around the world? Evidence from institutional investors;Journal of Financial Economics,2011
5. Foreign ownership, appointment of independent directors, and firm value: evidence from Japanese firms;Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation,2021