A multi-agency evaluation of the Leeds Dual Diagnosis care co-ordination protocol

Author:

Bell Richard

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the learning from the multi-agency evaluation of the Leeds Dual Diagnosis Care co-ordination protocol undertaken by the Leeds Dual Diagnosis (DD) Project in 2013. The evaluation aimed to identify the prevalence of people with DD accessing network member services, and to identify the standard of care network members provided for people with DD in relation to the Leeds Care Co-ordination Protocol. Design/methodology/approach – The evaluation adopted a service evaluation methodology and included features of real world research. Two standardised self-completion questionnaires were administered using Survey Monkey™ software. Findings – The majority of service could provide prevalence data however the quality of data provided was significantly impacted by the limitations of client management systems. Completion of specific DD training beyond basic awareness was generally low and many participants were confused about the different levels of training available. Standards of care varied, a substantial amount of joint working was taking place via informal pathways which relied on established relationships and trust between practitioners and services. Jointing working was often informal when people were not under the Care Programme Approach. Research limitations/implications – Due of the methodological choices the evaluation cannot be considered impartial. The prevalence data gathered lacks robustness and does not reflect the number of people who meet clinical threshold for DD as valid screening tools were not used by all services. The standards of care identified only reflect practitioner's personal views and do not provide a definitive answer to the standard of care being delivered. The response rate in relation to standards of care was low with large amounts of missing data negatively impacting the external validity of data gathered. Practical implications – The completion of this evaluation demonstrates that it is extremely challenging to undertake a multi-agency evaluation with limited resources. It has highlighted key challenges and areas for future development locally in relation to DD. The themes explored are likely to be of interest to commissioners, service managers, DD consultant nurses and anyone involved in the strategic development of DD. Originality/value – The evaluation has generated information which is of practical significance to local commissioners and Leeds DD Network Members. The knowledge and learning from this evaluation has subsequently been used by the Leeds DD Strategy Group to inform the new action plan for the DD Project, the re-commissioning of substance misuse services and the new mental health framework being developed for Leeds.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Phychiatric Mental Health

Reference55 articles.

1. Abou-Saleh, M.T. (2004), “Dual diagnosis: management within a psychosocial context”, Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, Vol. 10, pp. 352-60.

2. Afuwape, S.A. (2003), Where Are We with Dual Diagnosis (Substance Misuse and Mental Illness)? A Review of the Literature, Rethink, London.

3. Banerjee, S. , Clancy, C. and Crome, I. (Eds) (2002), Co-existing Problems of Mental Disorder and Substance Misuse (Dual Diagnosis): An Information Manual, College Research Unit and Royal College of Psychiatrists, London.

4. Bragato, L. and Jacobs, K. (2003), “Care pathways: the road to better health services?”, Journal of Health Organisation and Management, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 164-80.

5. Case-finding & Comorbidity in Addiction Services Research Programme (2012), “CCAS research programme summary: case-finding & comorbidity in addiction services”, available at: www.bps.org.uk/system/files/images/jaime_delgadillo_presentation_0.pdf (accessed 10 June 2014).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3