Author:
Atkins Jill Frances,Solomon Aris,Norton Simon,Joseph Nathan Lael
Abstract
Purpose
– This paper aims to provide evidence to suggest that private social and environmental reporting (i.e. one-on-one meetings between institutional investors and investees on social and environmental issues) is beginning to merge with private financial reporting and that, as a result, integrated private reporting is emerging.
Design/methodology/approach
– In this paper, 19 FTSE100 companies and 20 UK institutional investors were interviewed to discover trends in private integrated reporting and to gauge whether private reporting is genuinely becoming integrated. The emergence of integrated private reporting through the lens of institutional logics was interpreted. The emergence of integrated private reporting as a merging of two hitherto separate and possibly rival institutional logics was framed.
Findings
– It was found that specialist socially responsible investment managers are starting to attend private financial reporting meetings, while mainstream fund managers are starting to attend private meetings on environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. Further, senior company directors are becoming increasingly conversant with ESG issues.
Research limitations/implications
– The findings were interpreted as two possible scenarios: there is a genuine hybridisation occurring in the UK institutional investment such that integrated private reporting is emerging or the financial logic is absorbing and effectively neutralising the responsible investment logic.
Practical implications
– These findings provide evidence of emergent integrated private reporting which are useful to both the corporate and institutional investment communities as they plan their engagement meetings.
Originality/value
– No study has hitherto examined private social and environmental reporting through interview research from the perspective of emergent integrated private reporting. This is the first paper to discuss integrated reporting in the private reporting context.
Reference86 articles.
1. Ambachtsheer, J.
(2005), “Socially responsible investing - moving into the mainstream”, 23
June, available at: www.merceric.com
2. Archel, P.
,
Husillos, J.
and
Spence, C.
(2011), “The institutionalisation of unaccountability: loading the dice of corporate social responsibility discourse”,
Accounting, Organizations and Society
, Vol. 36 No. 6, pp. 327-343.
3. Atkins, J.F.
and
Maroun, W.
(2014), “South African institutional investors’ perceptions of integrated reporting”, ACCA Research Report.
4. Blatter, J.
(2003), “Beyond hierarchies and networks: institutional logics and change in transboundary spaces”,
Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions
, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 503-526.
5. Boatright, J.R.
(1999),
Ethics in Finance
, Foundations of Business Ethics, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
Cited by
83 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献