The impact of telephone crisis services on suicidal users: a systematic review of the past 45 years

Author:

Assing Hvidt Elisabeth,Ploug Thomas,Holm Søren

Abstract

Purpose – Telephone crisis services are increasingly subject to a requirement to “prove their worth” as a suicide prevention strategy. The purpose of this paper is to: first, provide a detailed overview of the evidence on the impact of telephone crisis services on suicidal users; second, determine the limitations of the outcome measures used in this evidence; and third, suggest directions for future research. Design/methodology/approach – MEDLINE via Pubmed (from 1966), PsycINFO APA (from 1967) and ProQuest Dissertation and Theses (all to 4 June 2015) were searched. Papers were systematically extracted by title then abstract according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Findings – In total, 18 articles met inclusion criteria representing a range of outcome measures: changes during calls, reutilization of service, compliance with advice, caller satisfaction and counsellor satisfaction. The majority of studies showed beneficial impact on an immediate and intermediate degree of suicidal urgency, depressive mental states as well as positive feedback from users and counsellors. Research limitations/implications – A major limitation pertains to differences in the use of the term “suicidal”. Other limitations include the lack of long-term follow-up and of controlled research designs. Future research should include a focus on long-term follow-up designs, involving strict data protection. Furthermore, more qualitative research is needed in order to capture the essential nature of the intervention. Originality/value – This paper attempts to broaden the study and the concept of “effectiveness” as hitherto used in the literature about telephone crisis services and offers suggestions for future research.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference45 articles.

1. Apsler, R. and Hoople, H. (1976), “Evaluation of crisis intervention services with anonymous clients”, American Journal of Community Psychiatry , Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 293-302.

2. Barraclough, B.M. , Jennings, C. and Moss, J.R. (1977), “Suicide prevention by the samaritans: a controlled study of effectiveness”, The Lancet , Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 237-8.

3. Becker, L.A. (1997), “Efficacy of suicide prevention center telephone interventions”, dissertation, Temple University Graduate Board, Ann Arbor, MI.

4. Chiang, W.H. (2011), “The effects of the telephone crisis service helpers’ interventions on non-suicidal, suicidal, acute suicidal callers in Taiwan: an efficacy study”, dissertation, the Graduate Faculty of Marital and Family Therapy Program, California School of Professional Psychology, Alliant International University, San Diego, CA.

5. Coveney, C.M. , Pollock, K. , Armstrong, S. and Moore, J. (2012), “Callers’ experiences of contacting a national suicide prevention helpline. Report of an online survey”, Crisis , Vol. 33 No. 6, pp. 313-24.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3