Lanchester resurgent? The mathematics of terrorism risk

Author:

Powers Michael R.

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this editorial is to consider whether or not the classical “Lanchester equations” of military combat are useful for modeling the financial risks associated with contemporary terrorist attacks.Design/methodology/approachThe paper begins by describing Lanchester's original model and its realm of applicability; then identifies shortcomings of the original equations, which, having been aggravated by differences between classical military combat and modern terrorist engagements, impede the application of the Lanchester paradigm in today's world. Finally, the paper explores whether or not these obstacles can be overcome by appropriate extensions of Lanchester's mathematical theory.FindingsThe principal result is that the Lanchester equations may be extended in a very natural way to include stochastic elements, difficult‐to‐quantify components, and various force asymmetries, thereby enabling the modeling of engagements between conventional and terrorist forces. Specifically, a family of diffusion processes is proposed to capture the terrorists' progress toward destroying a target, and provide a method for explicitly calculating the probability of target destruction.Originality/valueThe editorial seeks to model a category of catastrophe risk – terrorist attacks – for which the current mathematical literature (both military and financial) is somewhat limited.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Finance

Reference6 articles.

1. Lanchester, F.W. (1916), “Aircraft in warfare: the dawn of the fourth arm – the principle of concentration”, Engineering, Vol. 98, pp. 422‐3.

2. Major, J.A. (2002), “Advanced techniques for modeling terrorism risk”, Journal of Risk Finance, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 15‐24.

3. Perla, P.P. and Lehoczky, J.P. (1977), “A new approach to the analysis of stochastic Lanchester processes – time evolution”, Technical Report, Carnegie‐Mellon University Department of Statistics, Pittsburgh, PA.

4. Powers, M.R. (1995), “A theory of risk, return, and solvency”, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 101‐18.

5. Powers, M.R. (2005), “The terror of the ‘black box’”, Journal of Risk Finance, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 289‐91.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. When Lanchester met Richardson, the outcome was stalemate: A parable for mathematical models of insurgency;Journal of the Operational Research Society;2015-02

2. When Lanchester Met Richardson, the Outcome Was Stalemate: A Parable for Mathematical Models of Insurgency;OR, Defence and Security;2015

3. Discrete Combat Models;Innovations in Information Systems for Business Functionality and Operations Management;2012

4. Discrete Combat Models;International Journal of Operations Research and Information Systems;2010-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3