Author:
Angelidis Timotheos,Degiannakis Stavros
Abstract
PurposeAims to investigate the accuracy of parametric, nonparametric, and semiparametric methods in predicting the one‐day‐ahead value‐at‐risk (VaR) measure in three types of markets (stock exchanges, commodities, and exchange rates), both for long and short trading positions.Design/methodology/approachThe risk management techniques are designed to capture the main characteristics of asset returns, such as leptokurtosis and asymmetric distribution, volatility clustering, asymmetric relationship between stock returns and conditional variance, and power transformation of conditional variance.FindingsBased on back‐testing measures and a loss function evaluation method, finds that the modeling of the main characteristics of asset returns produces the most accurate VaR forecasts. Especially for the high confidence levels, a risk manager must employ different volatility techniques in order to forecast accurately the VaR for the two trading positions.Practical implicationsDifferent models achieve accurate VaR forecasts for long and short trading positions, indicating to portfolio managers the significance of modeling separately the left and the right side of the distribution of returns.Originality/valueThe behavior of the risk management techniques is examined for both long and short VaR trading positions; to the best of one's knowledge, this is the first study that investigates the risk characteristics of three different financial markets simultaneously. Moreover, a two‐stage model selection is implemented in contrast with the most commonly used back‐testing procedures to identify a unique model. Finally, parametric, nonparametric, and semiparametric techniques are employed to investigate their performance in a unified environment.
Reference35 articles.
1. Alexander, C.O. and Leigh, C.T. (1997), “On the covariance models used in value at risk models”, Journal of Derivatives, Vol. 4, pp. 50‐62.
2. Angelidis, T., Benos, A. and Degiannakis, S. (2004), “The use of GARCH models in VaR estimation”, Statistical Methodology, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 105‐28.
3. Barone‐Adesi, G. and Giannopoulos, K. (2001), “Non‐parametric VaR techniques: myths and realities”, Economic Notes, Vol. 30, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena, Siena, pp. 167‐81.
4. Barone‐Adesi, G., Giannopoulos, K. and Vosper, L. (1999), “VaR without correlations for nonlinear portfolios”, Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 19, pp. 583‐602.
5. Basle Committee on Banking Supervision (1996), “Supervisory framework for the use of ‘backtesting’ in conjunction with the internal models approach to market risk capital requirements”, Manuscript, Bank for International Settlements, Basle, available at: www.bis.org.
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献