Banks' risk management: a comparison study of UAE national and foreign banks

Author:

Hassan Al‐Tamimi Hussein A.,Mohammed Al‐Mazrooei Faris

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this research is to examine the degree to which the UAE banks use risk management practices and techniques in dealing with different types of risk. The secondary objective is to compare risk management practices between the two sets of banks.Design/methodology/approachThe authors developed a modified questionnaire, divided into two parts. The first part covers six aspects: understanding risk and risk management; risk identification; risk assessment and analysis; risk monitoring; risk management practices; and credit risk analysis. This part includes 43 closed‐ended questions based on an interval scale. The second part consists of two closed‐ended questions based on an ordinal scale dealing with two topics: methods of risk identification, and risks facing the sample banks.FindingsThis study found that the three most important types of risk facing the UAE commercial banks are foreign exchange risk, followed by credit risk, then operating risk. It also found that the UAE banks are somewhat efficient in managing risk, and risk identification and risk assessment and analysis are the most influencing variables in risk management practices. Finally, the results indicate that there is a significant difference between the UAE national and foreign banks in the practice of risk assessment and analysis, and in risk monitoring and controlling.Originality/valueThe article will be of value to those interested in the banking industry.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Finance

Reference17 articles.

1. Al‐Tamimi, H. (2002), “Risk management practices: an empirical analysis of the UAE commercial banks”, Finance India, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 1045‐57.

2. Anderson, R.A., Sweeney, D.J. and Williams, T.A. (1990), Statistics for Business and Economics, West Publishing Company, St. Paul, MN.

3. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (1999), “Principles for the management of credit risk”, consultative paper issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, issued for comment by 30 November, p. 3.

4. Carey, A. (2001), “Effective risk management in financial institutions: the Turnbull approach”, Balance Sheet, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 24‐7.

5. Devellis, R.F.. (1991), “Scale development: theory and application”, Applied Research Methods Service, Vol. 26, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.

Cited by 86 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3