Open access: help or hindrance to resource sharing?

Author:

Baich Tina

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine interlibrary loan (ILL) requests for open access materials submitted during fiscal years 2012 and 2013 and to consider the implications of open access for resource sharing. Design/methodology/approach – Borrowing requests for open access materials were quantitatively analyzed and compared to total borrowing requests and open access borrowing requests from the previous two fiscal years. Findings – During the period studied, borrowing requests for open access materials increased, while overall requests held steady. The difficulty users have in navigating the online information environment makes it unlikely that ILL requests will decrease significantly due to the growing amount of open access material available. Originality/value – The literature discussing the relationship between open access and ILL has expanded in recent years, but largely focuses on the negative impact of open access on resource sharing. This paper presents an update on previous research and provides contradictory evidence that the number of borrowing requests for open access documents continues to grow. Open access should be embraced as a help to resource sharing. This article is of great value to ILL practitioners looking for effective ways of identifying open access ILL requests.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference21 articles.

1. Artlisch, K. and O’Brien, P.S. (2011), “Invisible institutional repositories: addressing the low indexing ratios of IRs in Google Scholar”, Library Hi Tech , Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 60-81.

2. Baich, T. (2012), “Opening interlibrary loan to open access”, Interlending & Document Supply , Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 55-60.

3. Connaway, L.S. and Dickey, T.J. (2010), “The digital information seeker: report of the findings from selected OCLC, RIN, and JISC user behavior projects”, The Higher Education funding Council for England, on behalf of JISC, available at: www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/reports/2010/digitalinformationseekerreport.pdf (accessed 12 May 2014).

4. Connaway, L.S. , Dickey, T.J. and Radford, M.L. (2011), “‘If it is too inconvenient, I’m not going after it:’ convenience as a critical factor in information-seeking behaviors”, Library and Information Science Research , Vol. 33, pp. 179-190, available at: www.oclc.org/research/publications/library/2011/connaway-lisr.pdf (accessed 12 May 2014).

5. Corthouts, J. , Van Borm, J. and Van den Eynde, M. (2011), “Impala 1991-2011: 20 years of ILL in Belgium”, Interlending & Document Supply , Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 101-110.

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3