Best of the best: an investigation of policy enactment for key drivers of digitalization

Author:

Heidlund Marcus

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to explore whether the key drivers identified in digitalization policies are being prioritized by practitioners in health and social care and to what degree the goals of the policies are being enacted. Design/methodology/approach The investigation comprised two stages. First, the key drivers of digitalization in the national policies were identified. Second, a survey was disseminated to practitioners within health and social care, asking them to indicate their stance on each key driver (using Likert scales). Findings The findings of this paper are twofold. First, they demonstrate that practitioners more readily enact the key drivers centered around their everyday operations, such as improving services and care and increasing efficiency. Second, it shows that key drivers of a more rhetorical nature, such as “becoming the best,” do not yield benefits for practitioners. Practical implications This paper shows that for policies to have an effect in practice and to contribute to change, they should be rooted in key drivers centered around practitioners’ everyday operations, promoting specificity over abstraction. Originality/value While previous studies have involved policy analysis, few studies investigate the enactment of policies, how they are implemented and whether they contribute to changes in practice.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Information Systems and Management,Computer Science Applications,Public Administration

Reference28 articles.

1. What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes;Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education,1993

2. Policy actors: doing policy work in schools;Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education,2011

3. Digitalization;The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy,2016

4. Information systems in the public sector: the e-government enactment framework;The Journal of Strategic Information Systems,2010

5. Digitalization in sparsely populated areas: between place-based practices and the smart region agenda;Regional Studies,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3