Reinventing civil servants: Public management development and education to meet the managerialist challenge in Australia

Author:

Dixon John

Abstract

Australia began a comprehensive process of federal civil service reform in the 1970s, culminating in the introduction of a set of ambitious administrative reforms in the 1980s. Faced with the challenges of reform implementation, the traditional approach to public management development in the Australian Public Service (APS) was found wanting. By the end of the 1980s it was broadly accepted within the APS that the correct management development path to follow involved the articulation of management competences. The next challenge was to determine how best to inculcate these desired competences. Public management education emerged as one strategy. By placing emphasis on civil servants’ management competences, however, public management education compounds the risk that civil servants may become less able, even less willing, to understand and address the complexities of the regulatory and accountability regimes, and the ethical challenges created by the juxtaposition of administrative power with ambiguity, complexity and indeterminacy. All of these affect, if not govern, the way they must manage.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Reference115 articles.

1. 1.Considine, M., “Administrative reform ‘Down‐Under’: recent public sector changes in Australia and New Zealand”, International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 56 No. 1, March 1990, pp. 4‐18.

2. 2.Dixon, J., “The changing nature of public administration in Australia”, Public Personnel Management, Vol. 17 No. 2, Summer 1988, pp. 231‐6.

3. 3.Dixon, J. and Kouzmin, A., “Management innovations for improving governance: changes and trends in Australian public administration and finance”, Asian Review of Public Administration, Vol. 6 Nos 1‐2, January‐December 1994, pp. 33‐91.

4. 4.Codd, M., Federal Public Service Management Reform ‐ Recent History and Current Priorities, Occasional Paper No. 11, Senior Executive Staffing Unit, Public Service Commission, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1991.

5. 5.Kouzmin, A. and Dixon, J., “The dimensions of quality in public management: Australian perspectives and experiences”, in Hill, H. and Klages, H. (Eds), Qualitats und Erfolgsorientierte Vervaltung: Aktualle Tendenzen und Entwurfe (Quality and Success‐oriented Administrative Management: Current Trends and Models), Dunker and Humbolt, Berlin, 1993, pp. 211‐49.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3