Author:
Agyemang Gloria,Broadbent Jane
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to examine the management control systems developed by universities and groups within them, to manage research within UK University Business and Management Schools. Specifically, the paper analyses how universities develop their internal management control systems in response to an externally imposed regulatory system. It also provides an agenda for future research.
Design/methodology/approach
– The paper uses a middle range approach to consider the UK Research Excellence Framework (REF) and the previous Research Assessment Exercises. It uses the language provided by a number of conceptual frames to analyse insights from the lived experience, and builds on previous literature that has recognised the perverse outcomes of such performance measurement systems.
Findings
– The study finds that the internal management control systems developed by academics themselves amplify the controls imposed by the REF. These internal control systems are accepted by some academics although they encourage a movement away from previously held academic values.
Originality/value
– This study contributes to debates about the dysfunctional impacts of the use of performance measures to manage research. Its originality lies in explaining that the management control systems developed to resist the imposition of external performance measurement systems may lead to symbolic violence where participants become involved with their own subjugation.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Accounting
Reference103 articles.
1. Adler, R.W.
(2011), “Performance management and organizational strategy: how to design systems that meet the needs of confrontation strategy firms”,
The British Accounting Review
, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 251-263.
2. Ahrens, T.
and
Chapman, C.S.
(2004), “Accounting for flexibility and efficiency: a field study of management control systems in a restaurant chain”,
Contemporary Accounting Research
, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 271-301.
3. Anderson, G.L.
(1990), “Toward a critical constructivist approach to school administration: Invisibility, legitimation, and the study of non-events”,
Educational Administration Quarterly
, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 38-59.
4. Ashton, D.
,
Beattie, V.
,
Broadbent, J.
,
Brooks, C.
,
Draper, P.
,
Ezzamel, M.
,
Gwilliam, D.
,
Hodgkinson, R.
,
Hoskin, K.
and
Pope, P.
(2009), “British research in accounting and finance (2001-2007): the 2008 research assessment exercise”,
The British Accounting Review
, Vol. 41 No. 4, pp. 199-207.
5. Aspromourgos, T.
(2012), “The managerialist university: an economic interpretation”,
Australian Universities’ Review
, Vol. 54 No. 2, pp. 44-49.
Cited by
112 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献