Abstract
PurposeThis research aims to examine the performativity of corporate reports as an example of an accounting inscription that can frame the relationship between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander entities and their stakeholders. The framing and overflow effects of these reports have been explored to consider whether they strengthen or undermine the reputation and capability of these community-controlled entities.Design/methodology/approachAligned with actor–network theory and a decolonising research protocol, qualitative interviews were conducted with senior managers and directors of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander entities and their key stakeholders to explore their experiences of corporate reporting. Additional analysis of these organisations' annual reports was conducted to corroborate key reporting themes.FindingsThis research has identified a dual role for corporate reporting, simultaneously framing performance against an expectation of failure, but with the potential for accounting inscriptions to highlight positive contributions to cultural and community priorities. It also indicates the need for sector specifics within the reporting frameworks and adequate resourcing for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander entities to meet reporting obligations.Practical implicationsThis research makes policy-based recommendations in terms of user-driven and culturally informed performance measures. It also highlights the importance of adequate funding for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander entities to carry out meaningful performance evaluations beyond the preparation of financial statements.Originality/valueOne of the few empirical studies to capture the performativity of accounting inscriptions from the perspective of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander entities. This sector has received minimal attention within the accounting discipline, despite significantly contributing to community well-being and cultural protection. There is emancipatory potential via policy frameworks that resonate with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural beliefs and practices.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Accounting
Reference100 articles.
1. Engaging with organisations in pursuit of improved sustainability accounting and performance;Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,2007
2. Two types of bureaucracy: enabling and coercive;Administrative Science Quarterly,1996
3. Altman, J. and Biddle, N. (2015), “Refiguring indigenous economies: a 21st-century perspective”, Ville, S.P. and Withers, G. (Eds), The Cambridge Economic History of Australia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Attwood, B. and Markus, A. (1998), “Representation matters: the 1967 referendum and citizenship”, Peterson, N. and Sanders, W. (Eds), Citizenship and Indigenous Australians: Changing Conceptions and Possibilities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) (2012), “Guidelines for ethical research in indigenous studies”, available at: https://aiatsis.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-09/gerais.pdf (accessed 28 November 2022).