Author:
D. Raggio Randle,P. Leone Robert,C. Black William
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether brands impact consumer evaluations in ways other than a consistent halo and the degree to which consumers use both overall brand information along with detailed attribute-specific information to construct their evaluations.
Design/methodology/approach
– The authors decompose consumer evaluations of brand benefits into overall brand and detailed attribute-specific sources through a standard CFA approach. Data cover 55 brands in four product categories sold in nine global markets.
Findings
– Halo effects are rare in global CPG markets. The authors identify the presence of differential brand effects in eight of nine global markets tested. Application of an extended model to a market where several competing family brands are present demonstrates the ability of the model to identify relationships among brand offerings within a family brand and to differentiate between family brand sets.
Research limitations/implications
– The finding of differential effects calls into question the assumption of a consistent brand effect assumed in past research; future models should accommodate differential effects.
Practical implications
– The ability to decompose consumer brand-benefit beliefs into overall brand and detailed attribute-specific sources provides managers with insights into which latent mental sources consumers use to construct their brand beliefs. As such, the methodology provides useful descriptive and diagnostic measures concerning the sources of suspicious, interesting, or worrisome consumer brand beliefs as well as a means to determine if their branding, positioning and/or messaging is having the desired impact on consumer evaluations so that they can make and evaluate required changes.
Originality/value
– A significant contribution of this research is the finding that many times the brand source differentially impacts consumers' evaluations of brand-benefits, a finding that is contrary to a consistent halo effect that is assumed in prior models.
Subject
Marketing,Business and International Management
Reference37 articles.
1. Anderson, J.R.
(1983), “A spreading activation theory of memory”, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, Vol. 22, pp. 261-295.
2. Anderson, T.W.
and
Rubin, H.
(1956), “Statistical inference in factor analysis”, in
Neyman, J.
(Ed.), Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp. 111-150.
3. Bagozzi, R.P.
and
Yi, Y.
(1993), “Multitrait-multimethod matrices in consumer research: critique and new developments”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 143-170.
4. Barone, M.J.
,
Miniard, P.W.
and
Romeo, J.B.
(2000), “The influence of mood on brand extension evaluations”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 26, pp. 386-400.
5. Batra, R.
,
Lenk, P.
and
Wedel, M.
(2010), “Brand extension strategy planning: empirical estimation of brand-category personality fit and atypicality”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 47 No. 2, pp. 335-347.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献