Special safeguard tariff impacts on the Brazilian sugar exports

Author:

Costa Cinthia Cabral da,Burnquist Heloisa Lee,Guilhoto Joaquim José Martins

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to present a critical analysis of special safeguards (SSGs) and a simulation of their effects on Brazilian sugar exports to countries such as the US and the European Union (EU) bloc. Design/methodology/approach – The first stage involved the identification of tariff lines for the EU and the US sugar imports from Brazil between 1995 and 2013. Next, notifications of World Trade Organization about SSGs were examined to identify the years when the measure was applied on the sugar trade by these countries. For the years when SSGs were applied, the values of these additional tariffs were calculated. This information was used, along with price elasticities, to obtain the effects of an increase in Brazilian sugar exports in the absence of SSG and also the overall impact on the Brazilian economy, using its input-output matrix. Findings – Results indicated that the estimated value of the direct, indirect and income effects of SSG tariffs on Brazilian sugar exports to the EU and the US markets through the period 1995 to 2013 could amount to BRL 22 billion in terms of the exporting country GDP. This suggests that this policy can be highly perverse, as it translates into lower domestic production for both, the exporting and the importing countries. This issue is relevant for discussions on the global sugar market, given the facts that it is one of the markets which have been most distorted by protectionism. Originality/value – This issue is relevant for discussions on the global sugar market, given the facts that it is one of the markets which have been most distorted by protectionism.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Political Science and International Relations,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Industrial relations

Reference23 articles.

1. Brazil (2015), “Brazilian exports”, available at: http://aliceweb.mdic.gov.br/. (accessed 20 January).

2. Brown, A.G. and Stern, R.M. (2009), “Issues in fairness in dispute settlement”, in Hartigan, J.C. (Ed.), Trade Disputes and the Dispute Settlement Understanding of the WTO: An Interdisciplinary Assessment , 1st ed., Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Howard House.

3. EUROSTAT – European Commission (2014), “International trade, Data, Database”, available at: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/international_trade/data/database (accessed 20 September 2014).

4. FAO – Food and Agriculture Organization (2014), “FAOSTAT, food balance”, available at: http://faostat.fao.org/site/291/default.aspx (accessed 24 September 2014).

5. FAPRI – Food and Agriculture Policy Research Institute (2014), “Tools, elasticities database”, available at: www.fapri.iastate.edu/ (accessed 20 September 2014).

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3