Measurement of the social loss of wrong public budget allocation

Author:

Ben‐David Nissim,Tavor Tchai

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to measure the social loss occurring due to the inability of the government to use the real public demand function.Design/methodology/approachThe authors developed a model that enables maximization of the public utility of a given public budget by maximizing total consumer surplus, and presented a method for calculating the social loss due to the inability to use the real public demand function.FindingsThe social loss occurring due to the inability of the government to use the real public demand curve was shown.Research limitations/implicationsIn reality, it is impossible to get the proper evaluation of social utility function. Instead, the authors assumed a given public demand for each public good.Practical implicationsThe paper presents a way to measure overtime social loss as a function of the sum of overtime government expenses, the coefficient of variation of the public good supply and the elasticity of demand of the average demand curve.Social implicationsImproving the allocation of public budget.Originality/valueGiven the demand curve for each public good, this paper presents a technique for the optimal allocation of a given budget in order to maximize aggregate consumer surplus.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Social Sciences,Economics and Econometrics

Reference15 articles.

1. Auld, D.A.L. (1980), “Preference revelation for public goods: an empirical analysis”, Public Finance Quarterly, Vol. 8, pp. 277‐89.

2. Brookshire, D.S., Thayer, M.A., Schulze, W.D. and D'Arge, R.C. (1982), “Valuing public goods: a comparison of survey and hedonic approaches”, American Economic Review, Vol. 78, pp. 165‐77.

3. Cummings, R.G., Brookshire, D.S. and Schulze, W.D. (1986), Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method, Rowen and Allnheld, Totowa, NJ.

4. De Groot, H. and Pommer, E.J. (1987), “Budget games and the private and social demands for mixed public goods”, Public Choice, Vol. 52, pp. 257‐72.

5. Ferris, J.M. (1983), “Demands for public spending: an attitudinal approach”, Public Choice, Vol. 40, pp. 135‐54.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A decision model for municipal resources management;Management Decision;2019-11-12

2. Microeconomics for Infrastructure Rehabilitation;Construction Research Congress 2014;2014-05-13

3. A Logit Model for Budget Allocation Subject to Multi Budget Sources;Management Theories and Strategic Practices for Decision Making

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3