Intangible measurement guidelines: a comparative study in Europe

Author:

Bañegil Palacios Tomás M.,Sanguino Galván Ramón

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present and compare some of the most recent and significant contributions from European researchers to the field of the measurement and management of intangibles.Design/methodology/approachThe analysis was carried out on two different levels. First, how the guidelines were developed was examined. Second, the recommendations derived from these guidelines were evaluated.FindingsThe first conclusion drawn in this paper is the lack of a unique Conceptual Framework to carry out Intellectual Capital Reports – even though there are no significant differences among the analysed guidelines.Originality/valueThe paper shows that, in line with the increasing importance of the intangible economy in the last few years, a significant number of models has been published. Unlike previously published papers, the main original contribution in the measurement of Intellectual Capital relates to the comparison and assessment of the various existing guidelines.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting,Education

Reference29 articles.

1. Bañegil, T. and Sanguino, R. (2003), ”A comparative study of the different guidelines for intangibles measurement and management”, Proceedings Internacional IC of Intellectual Capital Congress, Hanken Business School, Helsinki.

2. Barceló, M. (2003), Hacia una economía del conocimento, Esic Editorial y PriceWaterhouseCoopers, Madrid.

3. Camisón, C. (2002), “Competencias distitintivas basadas en activos intangibles”, in Bueno, E. (Ed.), Nuevas Claves para la Dirección Estratégica, Ariel Economía, Madrid, pp. 117‐57.

4. Carter, A. (1996), Measuring the Performance of a Knowledge‐based Economy, OECD Report: Employment and Growth in the Knowledge‐based Economy, pp. 61‐8.

5. Cañibano, L., García Ayuso, M. and Sánchez, M.P. (2000), “Shortcomings in the measurement of innovation: implication for accounting standard setting”, Journal of Management and Governance, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 1‐24.

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Evolutionary Trends of Intangibles Disclosure Within Non-financial Reporting;SIDREA Series in Accounting and Business Administration;2022

2. Does Intellectual Capital Efficiency Affect Earnings Quality? Evidence for Jordanian Listed Companies;Open Journal of Accounting;2022

3. New insights into the nexus between board characteristics and intellectual capital disclosure: the case of the emerging economy of Mauritius;Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies;2021-05-31

4. Intellectual Capital: Brief State-of-the-Art;Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing;2021

5. Stakeholder Theory, Intellectual Capital and Risk Sharing: Proposed Framework;Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Knowledge Management;2019-09-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3