Author:
Das Somnath,Sen Pradyot K.,Sengupta Sanjit
Abstract
Considers two forms of strategic alliances, technological and marketing, and examines how these alliances foster formation and maintenance of intellectual capital. Empirical evidence suggests that on average, strategic alliances do create value for shareholders that is consistent with the creation of intellectual capital. Between the two, technological alliances are potentially more beneficial than marketing alliances, and more likely to create intellectual capital. Empirical evidence is consistent with the notion that the gains from alliances are not shared equally by all the partners. When intellectual capital is created by the smaller or financially weaker partner, the return may be appropriately captured by the owner of such capital through strategic alliances. However, if the intellectual capital is created by the larger or financially stronger firm which moves first in an alliance relationship, the return on this intellectual capital may be subject to opportunistic exploitation by the late moving partner.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting,Education
Reference24 articles.
1. Aaker, D.A. (1995), Strategic Market Management, 4th ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
2. Adler, L. (1966), “Symbiotic marketing”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 44, pp. 59–71.
3. Borys, B. and Jemison, D.B. (1989), “Hybrid arrangements as strategic alliances: theoretical issues in organizational combinations”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 234–50.
4. Bucklin, L.P. and Sengupta, S. (1993), “Organizing successful co‐marketing alliances”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57 No. 2, pp. 32–46.
5. Carroll, P. (1993), Big Blues: The Unmaking of IBM, Crown Publishers, New York, NY.
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献