Author:
Litschka Michael,Markom Andreas,Schunder Susanne
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide a quantitative assessment model for intellectual capital in companies.Design/methodology/approachA brief historical review of former approaches to evaluate intellectual capital construction of a new formula for an intellectual capital value. A possible empirical survey of influence factors on intellectual capital is suggested. Both, taken together, are the grounding of an integrative management model for intellectual capital still to be developed.FindingsShows that a quantitative figure for intellectual capital can be found and that such a figure is needed to convince managers and the public of the usefulness of activities to promote intellectual (and especially human) capital.Research limitations/implicationsA quantitative measure can never picture the complete interrelations of organizational development, influence factors on intellectual capital, and performance of employees. The formula can only be a starting‐point for management and further research. Possible management tools are only touched on briefly.Practical implicationsGives the manager a tool to argue his decisions regarding the promotion of human and intellectual capital. Managers talk about figures and often dislike purely philosophical arguments. Their awareness of the topic can be raised.Originality/valueEven though there is a growing scientific body of quantitative models for measuring intellectual capital, this paper uses a new approach: the usage of approximation factors for motivation, commitment and job satisfaction in one formula.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting,Education
Reference24 articles.
1. Becker, G. (1975), Human Capital, 2nd ed., Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
2. Blau, G.J. (1986), “Job involvement and organizational commitment as interactive predictors of tardiness and absenteeism”, Journal of Management, Vol. 12, pp. 577‐84.
3. Blau, G.J. and Boal, K.B. (1987), “Conceptualizing how job involvement and organisational commitment affect turnover and absenteeism”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 12, pp. 288‐300.
4. Blau, G.J. and Boal, K.B. (1989), “Using job involvement and organisational commitment interactively to predict turnover”, Journal of Management, Vol. 15, pp. 115‐27.
5. Bleicher, K. (1992), Das Konzept Integriertes Management, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/New York, NY.
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献