Author:
Arena Claudia,Liong Ronald,Vourvachis Petros
Abstract
PurposeMotivated by legitimacy theory, this paper aims to examine comprehensively corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in Southeast Asian (Association of Southeast Asian Nations [ASEAN]) countries with the aim of disentangling whether such disclosures are the result of a proactive stance or a reaction to regulations.Design/methodology/approachAfter a content analysis of CSR stand-alone reports that relies on the Global Reporting Initiative as the basis for comparison, a multivariate analysis is carried out while controlling for firm-specific incentives and industry, country and year fixed effects.FindingsThe paper finds that CSR disclosure increased across the entire ASEAN. Although this increase cannot be directly ascribed to the introduction of regulations in Indonesia and Malaysia, the latter may have impacted choices of disclosure media. In countries where reporting requirements have become mandated, mandatory reporters show low levels, and voluntary reporters high levels, of CSR disclosure. The paper also finds that the attainment of CSR awards is related to disclosure. Additional analyses reveal a substitution effect between voluntary and mandatory incentives in countries with high levels of law enforcement.Practical implicationsThe evidence suggests that the introduction of regulations can be effective in improving the level and breadth of CSR reporting only in the presence of institutions that ensure the enforcement of the disclosure regulations.Social implicationsThe evidence suggests that organizations are reluctant to report on issues such as child labor, human rights and corruption. Organizations opportunistically employ related disclosure strategies that deviate from the underlying CSR performance.Originality/valueThe paper analyzes not only the level and breadth of CSR disclosure but also the motivation for its use across the still under-investigated ASEAN area, thus allowing an examination of the influence of institutional incentives above and beyond the firm-specific factors that drive CSR activities.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference106 articles.
1. ACCA (Association of Chartered Certified Accountants) (2004), “Report summary: the state of corporate environmental and social reporting in Malaysia 2004”, available at: www2.accaglobal.com/documents/malaysian_state_of_ser2004.pdf (accessed 21 May 2013).
2. ACCA (Association of Chartered Certified Accountants) (2010), “Sustainability reporting: the rise of the report and the regulator”, available at: www2.accaglobal.com/documents/sustainabilityreportingfutur.pdf (accessed 2 November 2012).
3. Corporate equal opportunities (non) disclosure;British Accounting Review,1995
4. Evidence in development of sustainability reporting: a case of a developing country;Business Strategy and the Environment,2011
5. The effect of award on CSR disclosures in annual reports of Malaysian PLCs;Social Responsibility Journal,2015
Cited by
73 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献