Doha dead and buried in Nairobi: lessons for the WTO

Author:

Martin Antoine,Mercurio Bryan

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to reflect on the outcomes of the Nairobi Ministerial Conference of 2015, which, for all intents and purposes, put the Doha Round to rest and analyses the policy implications and lessons for policymaking at the World Trade Organization (WTO), most importantly the abandonment of the “single undertaking” and return to plurilateral agreements. Design/methodology/approach The paper approaches the issue of WTO policymaking by analysing the various outputs produced both before and because of the Ministerial Conference. Findings The paper suggests that the Nairobi Ministerial has finally put an end to the Doha Round and comes to the conclusion that policymaking at the multilateral level (i.e. through the single undertaking) will change significantly in the future because the WTO Members are incapable of reaching a comprehensive agreement at this time. Instead, the current trend towards trade policymaking via FTA is likely to continue while the WTO focuses on plurilateral negotiations on narrow and discreet issues. Originality/value The paper contributes to the literature on the analysis of global regulatory fragmentation and on trade policymaking. It draws attention, in particular, to the consequences of the last Ministerial Conference and highlights prospects for the future of global trade regulation.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Political Science and International Relations,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Industrial relations

Reference56 articles.

1. How to revive Doha with some chance of success,2009

2. Adlung, R. and Mamdouh, H. (2013), “How to design trade agreements in services: top down or bottom-up?”, WTO Staff Working Paper ERSD-2013-08, pp. 3-4.

3. Agricultural trade reform and the Doha development agenda;The World Economy,2005

4. It’s time to seal the deal on global-trade reforms,2016

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Conflicting Justice Notions in the World Trade Organization: Sweden as a Broker;INT NEGOT;2023

2. Prospects and Challenges of Embedding the Human Right to Food Obligations into the Legal Framework for International Agricultural Trade Regulation;Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa;2022-11-07

3. Conflicting Justice Notions in the World Trade Organization: Sweden as a Broker;International Negotiation;2022-09-12

4. Informal Regional Institutions and National Resilience;Handbook of Research on the Empirical Aspects of Strategic Trade Negotiations and Management;2021

5. Trade, Investment and Corporate Sustainability;The Cambridge Handbook of Corporate Law, Corporate Governance and Sustainability;2019-12-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3