Swedish pig producers and their perspectives on animal welfare: a case study

Author:

Bruckmeier Karl,Prutzer Madeleine

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to identify the views of Swedish pig producers concerning animal welfare, the schemes practised for animal welfare in Sweden, and the ramifications of animal welfare for Swedish retailers and consumers.Design/methodology/approachThe Swedish study for animal welfare covers a pig‐production sector of 2,794 producers (2005). The pig production study was one of three such studies conducted as part of the EU's Welfare Quality project with semi‐structured interviews (the other two studies were on cattle and poultry production). The stratified sample included 60 pig producers, both conventional and organic, selected from all areas of Sweden.FindingsThe main results show a high level of animal care exercised in the Swedish pig production sector. Although there are no specific animal welfare schemes implemented, there is a high level of animal care provided by farmer participation in quality assurance schemes that include animal welfare stipulations, among other criteria.Practical implicationsThe results from this pig production study will serve as input for a subsequent study of the on‐farm practice of animal welfare for the Welfare Quality project and as information material for policy to argue for more compatible criteria of welfare schemes at national level as well as for more homogeneous practice and standards of animal welfare within the EU.Originality/valueThis is the first in‐depth study on animal welfare in Swedish agriculture that takes into account a wide array of views and experiences of both conventional and organic producers. Prior to this animal welfare study only studies with a narrow focus on animal welfare, for example about organic production, and the State Audit Institution's report, which focuses on the effectiveness in animal welfare monitoring, have been produced.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Food Science,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference16 articles.

1. Åkeson, E. and Nilsson, J. (2003), “Att välja grisslakteri: En fråga om både ekonomi och psykologi”, Faktablad Jordbruk, Nr 13:2003. SLU, Uppsala, Sweden.

2. Johansson, U. and Alm, K. (2005), “Non‐retailer led labelling schemes in Sweden”, (Report from Welfare Quality‐project, Retailer Study), Lund University, Lund.

3. Jordbruksstatistisk Årsbok (2005), Statistical Yearbook for Agriculture: Including Food Statistics, (Med data om livsmedel), Statistics Sweden, Stockholm.

4. Jordbruksverket (2003), Marknadsöversikt: Animalier: Rapport 2003:24, Jordbruksverket, Jönköping.

5. KRAV (2006), Regler för KRAV‐certifierad produktion: Januari 2007, KRAV ekonomisk förening, Uppsala.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3