Author:
Bamel Nisha,Dhir Sanjay,Sushil Sushil
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to identify the inter-partner dynamics-based enablers of joint venture (JV) competitiveness. In addition, this paper models the interactions among identified enablers/factors to project the strength of their relationship with JV competitiveness.
Design/methodology/approach
ISM- and total interpretive structural modeling (TISM)-based fuzzy TISM approach has been used to examine the interactions and strength of interactions among identified enablers of JV competitiveness.
Findings
The analysis concludes that inter-partner dynamics-based enablers, such as partner fit, power symmetry and trust, have strong driving power and low dependence power and are at the lowest level of hierarchy in fuzzy TISM model. Variables like collaborative communication, organizational learning and absorptive capacity are linkage variables and they have high dependence as well as driving power and they lie in the second level of fuzzy TISM hierarchy. Strategic flexibility is found to have high dependence power and has weak driving power. The outcome variable JV competitiveness found to have zero driving power and highest dependence power.
Practical implications
The findings have implications for practitioners and policy makers. JVs may achieve competitiveness by managing identified enablers (inter-partner dynamics).
Originality/value
Present paper is one among the few efforts that address the issue of JV competitiveness (post-formation of JV). Methodologically also, this study is one among few initial efforts of using modified fuzzy TISM to explore and understand the linkage among enablers and outcome variables. Modified fuzzy TISM process carries out transitivity checks along with the successive pair-wise comparisons and simplifies the fuzzy TISM approach.
Subject
Business and International Management,Strategy and Management
Reference99 articles.
1. The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory;Journal of Management,2001
2. Challenges for Indian software firms to sustain their global competitiveness;Singapore Management Review,2004
3. Firm-specific knowledge and competitive advantage: evidence and KM practices;Knowledge and Process Management,2008
4. Organizational resources, KM process capability and strategic flexibility: a dynamic resource-capability perspective;Journal of Knowledge Management,2018
5. Managing an alliance portfolio;The McKinsey Quarterly,2002
Cited by
46 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献