Abstract
PurposeService failures usually occur in front of third-party customers. Third-party customers react emotionally and behaviorally to service failure and recovery efforts aimed at focal customers. However, there is a gap in the literature on how third-party customers react to a service failures incident and a recovery over another customer, depending on how socially close or distant they are from. This study investigates the effect of third-party customers' emotions on consumer forgiveness, negative word-of-mouth (WoM) and repatronage intentions in the service recovery process by comparing close and distant third-party customers.Design/methodology/approachThis study utilizes a 2 (social distance to the focal customer: close, distant) × 2 (service recovery: yes, no) between-subjects design. The authors used a scenario-based experiment to test the proposed hypotheses. A total of 576 respondents were involved in the study.FindingsThe results from the authors' scenario-based experimental study show that positive and negative emotions felt by distant third-party customers are higher than those of close third-party customers. In addition, the effect of positive emotions on customer forgiveness is more substantial for distant third-party customers. Third, moderated-mediation analysis indicates that social distance has a moderator effect only on the relationship between positive emotions and customer forgiveness.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the service literature by comparing socially close and socially distant third-party customers' reactions to service failure and recovery attempts.
Reference107 articles.
1. Five imperatives for improving service quality;Sloan Management Review,1990
2. The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on post complaint behavior;Journal of Retailing,1997
3. An experimental study of service recovery options;International Journal of Service Industry Management,1997
4. Angry customers don't come back, they get back: the experience and behavioral implications of anger and dissatisfaction in services;Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,2003
5. Empathy for service: benefits, unintended consequences, and future research agenda;Journal of Services Marketing,2019