Author:
Lyons Paul,Paul Bandura Randall
Abstract
Purpose
– The purposes of this article are to familiarize the reader with scenistic learning tools, provide theory bases for the tools, present details for use of the tools in an organization, and offer details with reference to the efficacy of scenistic learning tools.
Design/methodology/approach
– The approach taken is to provide sufficient information for a practitioner to apply scenistic tools with confidence. The paper provides the background and explicit details for using scenistic tools in practice.
Findings
– The findings demonstrate positive effects of training with scenistic tools. The effects are limited to specific areas.
Practical implications
– Several different instructional and/or training approaches may come under the rubric, scenistic, to include case analyses, use of critical incidents, story board and others. This article offers a complete model of how to create and apply a scenistic approach in an orchestrated manner to achieve positive change in an organization.
Originality/value
– The article demonstrates how managers, training staff, and employees (trainees) work in a partnership to create and apply script-based practice guides and interventions to assist in solving actual organizational issues and problems.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,General Business, Management and Accounting,Education
Reference22 articles.
1. Anderson, J.R.
,
Reder, L.M.
and
Simon, H.A.
(1996), “Situated learning and education”, Educational Researcher, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 5-11.
2. Bandura, R.P.
and
Lyons, P.
(2012), “Helping managers stimulate employee voluntary helpful behavior”, Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 94-102.
3. Barnes, L.B.
,
Christensen, C.R.
and
Abby, J.H.
(1994), Teaching and the Case Method: Text, Cases, and Readings, Harvard Business Review Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Brady, M.
(2004), “Thinking big: a conceptual framework for the study of everything”, Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 86 No. 4, pp. 276-281.
5. Christensen, C.R.
,
Garvin, D.A.
and
Sweet, A.
(1991), Education for Judgment: The Artistry of Discussion Leadership, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献