Critical reflections on quality standards within drug demand reduction

Author:

Graf Niels,Stöver Heino

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to critically reflect on the usefulness of quality standards aimed at prevention interventions for drug using young offenders. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses critical literature on quality standards, readings of quality standards and qualitative interviews as well as focus-group discussions with professionals working in services targeting drug use among young offenders. Findings The findings show discrepancies between the idea that quality standards provide a tool for supporting the implementation of more effective interventions and professionals’ experiences with quality standards as almost absent in their work. Originality/value This viewpoint highlights barriers to the implementation of quality standards that have to be overcome if quality standards are to be adopted and implemented in practice.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference32 articles.

1. Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors;Aministration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research,2011

2. Autrique, M., Demarest, I., Goethals, I., De Maeyer, J., Ansseau, M. and Vanderplasschen, M. (2016), “Consensus building on minimal and ideal quality standards for prevention, treatment and harm reduction of substance use disorders”, available at: www.belspo.be/belspo/organisation/Publ/pub_ostc/Drug/rDR66summ_en.pdf (accessed December 4, 2018).

3. Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework;Regulation & Governance,2007

4. Brunsson, N. and Jacobsson, B. (2000), “The contemporary expansion of standardization”, in Brunsson, N. and Jacobsson, B. (Eds), A World of Standards, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1-20.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3