Author:
Herold Maria Dich,Rand Cecilia,Frank Vibeke Asmussen
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to discuss how a “holistic approach” is enacted in two interventions accommodating the same target group, young adults with offending behaviour and drug use experiences, but offered in very different contexts, the Prison Service and the community. The aim is to show how enactments of a “holistic approach”, although similar on paper, differ in welfare institutional practices due especially to organisational and structural conditions.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper is based on qualitative semi-structured interviews and written material from and about the two interventions.
Findings
Different enactments of a “holistic approach”, due to organisational and structural conditions of the interventions, construct different possibilities for institutional identities. These insights could be useful to take into consideration when discussing prevention initiatives (in a broad sense) for young people with complex problems, including co-occurring offending behaviour and drug use experience.
Originality/value
Research with a focus on citizens with complex problems who do not comply with OR conform to standard welfare institutions are limited. The authors contribute to this literature by focussing on young adults with offending behaviour and drug experiences.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference35 articles.
1. Researching organizational imbrications and interstices: a qualitative gaze on how mundane public administration works;Qualitative Studies,2018
2. Massiv kritik: straf til børn bekæmper ikke kriminalitet,2018
3. Fundamentet: Sociale forandringer i bæredygtigt fællesskab;Community based intervention,2016
4. Empowerment in drug treatment: dilemmas in implementing policy in welfare institutions;Social Science & Medicine,2011
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献