Workplace inequality, trade unions and the transnational regulation of the employment relationships
Author:
Pulignano Valeria
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to report on research on the strategies of inequality at the workplace level of multinational corporations within the context characterized by the weakening of traditional bargaining and representation structures. Through which specific strategies multinational corporations foster inequality across different workplaces across borders and how do trade unions in Europe respond to it?
Design/methodology/approach
This paper is a conceptual one and it is based on existing qualitative comparative research developed by the author.
Findings
The regulatory regime of organized and governed labor markets and employment relationships is undermined by the employment relationships becoming increasingly unstable in most industrialized countries in Europe. The breakdown in the collective structures for employment regulation, particularly collective bargaining, has led to growing insecurity and inequality among working people. At the workplace level of multinationals inequality is fostered by strategies of flexibilization and benchmarking which force trade unions to negotiate concessions regarding the working conditions of different workers. Trade unions are seeking effective responses to increasing labor market instability and inequality. The paper argues that the transnational regulation of employment relationships through the European Framework Agreements (EFAs) can serve the purpose of constraining benchmarking, while containing workplace inequality.
Originality/value
This paper offers an in-depth view that the EFAs can constrain the multinationals’ strategies of benchmarking and workplace inequality. This is because EFAs can potentially spread across countries the positive gains of local negotiations where unions are able to negotiate on employment protection to other local subsidiaries where unions may struggle to do so.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Industrial relations
Reference59 articles.
1. Alès, E., Engblom, S., Jaspers, T., Laulom, S., Sciarra, S., Sobczak, A. and Valdés Dal-Ré, F. (2006), “Transnational collective bargaining. Past, present and future”, final report, European Commission, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, Brussels. 2. Belanger, J. and Edwards, P. (2006), “Towards a political economy framework: TNC as national and global players”, in Ferner, A., Quintanilla, J. and Sanchez-Runde, C. (Eds), Multinationals, Institutions and the Construction of Transnational Practices: Convergence and Diversity in the Global Economy, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 24-52. 3. Benassi, C. (2013), “Political economy of labour market segmentation”, Agency work in the automobile industry, ETUI Working paper No. 6, Brussels. 4. Bredgaard, T. (2013), “Flexibility and security in employment regulations: learning from Denmark”, in Stone, K. and Arthurs, A. (Eds), Rethinking Workplace Regulation, Russel Sage Foundation, London, pp. 213-232. 5. Brewster, C., Goergen, M. and Wood, G. (2008), “The shifting boundaries of governance: the effects of the national setting and ownership changes on employment practice”, ECGI-Finance Working Paper No. 136/2006, ECGI.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|