Author:
Roeser Tobias,Kern Eva-Maria
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to conduct a literature review to provide an overview of surveys focussing on business process management (BPM)/business process orientation (BPO) or on BPM-related topics in order to describe the status quo, uncover trends, classify survey contributions and assess the possible further development of survey research.
Design/methodology/approach
– In order to achieve the research goals, the authors conduct a literature review. The authors analyze the retrieved literature by means of a developed analysis framework which allows the authors to examine the surveys from the meta-perspective and content-based perspective.
Findings
– A lot of surveys focussing on BPM/BPO or on BPM-related topics have been published in German- and English-speaking literature over the last years. Nevertheless, the authors find out that while some topics, countries/regions and industries are well explored others were neglected in the past. Moreover, the authors provide first evidence that companies have a different BPM demand. Finally, the authors conclude that although the implications of the incorporated surveys provide a good starting point for practitioners they seem to be too abstract to be helpful for them. Thus, the authors recommend the conduction of qualitative research endeavors to develop adaptable theories for practitioners.
Research limitations/implications
– This literature review focusses on survey research in BPM. It could be repeated in order to verify the findings and moreover to track progress. However, although the authors followed the steps proposed for a literature review, the selection of relevant articles might be a limitation of this paper.
Originality/value
– The literature review provides an overview of surveys focussing on BPM/BPO or on BPM-related topics that have been published so far. The developed and strictly applied analysis framework supports a systematic analysis of survey research and could therefore provide a detailed picture of the current state of this research field. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no comparable literature review has been undertaken until now.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management
Reference82 articles.
1. Alibabaei, A.
,
Bandara, W.
and
Aghdasi, M.
(2009), “Means of achieving business process management success factors”, Proceedings of the 4th Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems, Athens, September 25-27.
2. Anderson, J.C.
,
Rungtusanatham, M.
,
Schroeder, R.G.
and
Devaraj, S.
(1995), “A path analytic model of a theory of quality management underlying the deming management method: preliminary empirical findings”,
Decision Sciences
, Vol. 26 No. 5, pp. 637-658.
3. Antonucci, Y.L.
and
Goeke, R.J.
(2011), “Identification of appropriate responsibilities and positions for business process management success: seeking a valid and reliable framework”,
Business Process Management Journal
, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 127-146.
4. Bailey, M.T.
(1992), “Do physicists use case studies? Thoughts on public administration research”,
Public Administration Review
, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 47-54.
5. Becker, J.
,
Niehaves, B.
and
Plattfaut, R.
(2010), “Stakeholder involvement in business process management agenda-setting and implementation”, Proceedings of the 16th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Lima, August 12-15.
Cited by
36 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献