Abstract
PurposeWe model the relation between excess returns, fund size and industry size for active equity funds.Design/methodology/approachWe study and contrast four markets – global equities, emerging markets, Australia core and Australia small caps – and use the results to investigate the extent to which funds deviate from estimated capacity.FindingsWe uncover a significantly negative relation between returns and both fund size and industry size across all markets. The estimated percentage of funds operating above versus below capacity varies both across markets and over time, as does the role played by fund size versus industry size. We find a greater prevalence of funds operating significantly below than above capacity, in contrast to findings for US equity mutual funds. Significant deviations from estimated capacity persist for a median of between two and six quarters.Originality/valueOur main contribution is to show that the dynamics governing deviations from capacity for active equity funds vary across markets.
Reference57 articles.
1. Diseconomies of scale in the actively-managed mutual fund industry: what do the outliers in the data tell us?;Critical Finance Review,2018
2. Impact of fund size and fund flows on hedge fund performance;Journal of Alternative Investments,2008
3. Andonov, A., Bauer, R. and Cremers, M. (2012), “Can large pension funds beat the market? Asset al location, market timing, security selection and the limits of liquidity”, Netspar Discussion Paper No. 10/2012-062, available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2214931
4. Intermediated investment management in private markets: evidence from pension fund investments in real estate;Journal of Financial Markets,2015
5. The economic gain of being small in the mutual fund industry: US and international evidence;International Review of Financial Analysis,2021