Eco-innovation practices
Author:
Mele Cristina,Russo-Spena Tiziana
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to examine eco-innovation practices within project networks. Eco-innovation practices involve systematic series of actions that integrate resources to create value.
Design/methodology/approach
– Using case research, the authors conducted an intensive study of innovation practices within project networks, using multiple sources of evidence to provide information to scholars and practitioners (Halinen and Tornroos, 2005). Analyzing practices facilitated an empirical investigation of how contextual elements shaped the social construction of eco-innovation.
Findings
– An empirical analysis of eight project networks identifies three eco-innovation practices: cleaning up the landscape, connecting life and work, and boosting the efficiency of inbound and outbound processes. A methodological framework based on this practice approach is used to discuss the main elements of the practices in question, including actors, actions, resources, and value.
Practical implications
– The practice-based approach (PBA) may help companies to make information and communication technology (ICT) more sustainable. By developing forms of eco-innovation that support project networks, companies can focus on holistic corporate performance, efficiency, and business value. Eco-innovation thus becomes a collective achievement that allows practitioners to appraise and critique the performance of their environmental practices, and that thereby allows them to constantly refine those practices.
Social implications
– The development and use of Green ICT solutions enable actors’ sense-making and sense-giving within ongoing social practices wherein macro-level phenomena, such as sustainability and environmental issues, are created and recreated through the micro-level actions of project network actors.
Originality/value
– This research extends beyond the more traditional issues of ecologically sound company operations and sustainable ICT use to address sustainable ways of doing business.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference105 articles.
1. Araujo, L.
,
Kjellberg, H.
and
Spencer, R.
(2008), “Market practices and forms: introduction to the special issue”,
Marketing Theory
, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 5-14. 2. Arundel, A.
and
Kemp, R.
(2009), “Measuring eco-innovation”, UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series 017, United Nations University, Maastricht Economic, Maastricht. 3. Baraldi, E.
,
Brennan, R.
,
Harrison, D.
,
Tunisini, A.
and
Zolkiewski, J.
(2007), “Strategic thinking and the IMP approach: a comparative analysis”,
Industrial Marketing Management
, Vol. 36 No. 7, pp. 879-894. 4. Baraldi, E.
,
Gregori, G.L.
and
Perna, A.
(2011), “Network evolution and the embedding of complex technical solutions: the case of the Leaf House network”,
Industrial Marketing Management
, Vol. 40 No. 6, pp. 838-853. 5. Barnes, B.
(2001), “Practice as a collective action”, in
Schatzki, T.R.
,
Cetina, K.K.
and
Von Savigny, E.
(Eds),
The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory
, Routledge, Oxon, pp. 17-28.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|