Vulnerability to flood-induced public health risks in Sudan
Author:
Bashier Abbas Haitham,K. Routray Jayant
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to analyze flood vulnerability vis-à-vis flood-induced health risks, and understand the relationship between them to suggest measures to reduce health risks in Sudan.
Design/methodology/approach
– This study compares the vulnerability to flood and health consequences in two communities in Aroma. This study compares the vulnerability of Aroma semi-urban vicinity and Tendellei rural village, in Sudan, to flood and health consequences. A set of socioeconomic and health indicators were studied in 251 households. Households were classified according to their calculated vulnerability composite index. The index was validated through comparing the vulnerability values with the level of impact in each household.
Findings
– About 30 percent of households are highly/very highly vulnerable to flood risk. On the other hand, 41 percent of the rural households and 25 percent of the semi-urban houses are highly/very highly vulnerable to health risks. The main determinants of flood vulnerability are; the number of earning family members, level of education and economic activity of the household's head. The rural households are found to be more vulnerable to health risks while semi-urban households are more vulnerable to flooding. Flood and health vulnerabilities are positively correlated. Factors like urbanization, poverty and education directly affect the vulnerability of communities.
Research limitations/implications
– The methodology could be strengthened through the running of multi-various regression to relate selected vulnerability indicators to incidence of malaria and diarrhea in each household.
Practical implications
– The method described in this paper is flexible; applicable and can be reproduced for other areas and risks.
Social implications
– Vulnerability determinants affect the two communities differently and this necessitates specific consideration when developing policy. The policy should tackle the root causes of vulnerability to cut the vicious circle of poverty, illiteracy and illness. Those root causes should be managed by integrating multi-hazard approaches for effective and efficient interventions.
Originality/value
– The method described in this paper is original, flexible; applicable and can be reproduced for other areas and risks.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Health(social science)
Reference83 articles.
1. Abbas, H.B.
and
Routray, J.K.
(2013), “A semi-quantitative risk assessment model of primary health care service interruption during flood: case study of Aroma locality, Kassala state of Sudan”, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol. 6, December, pp. 118-128. 2. Abuaku, B.K.
,
Zhou, J.
,
Li, X.
,
Li, S.
,
Li, X.
,
Liu, A.
and
Yang, T.
et al. (2009), “Morbidity and mortality among populations suffering floods in Hunan, China: the role of socioeconomic status”, Journal of Flood Risk Management, Vol. 2 No. 3. 3. ACF
(2010), Comprehensive Household Vulnerability and Risk Analysis: Camarines Sur and Catanduanes, ACF, Bicol Region, pp. 1-109. 4. Ahern, M.
,
Kovats, R.S.
,
Wilkinson, P.
,
Few, R.
and
Franziska, M.
(2005), “Health and flood risk: a strategic assessment of adaptation processes and policies”, pp. 2-27. 5. Arbaiah, O.
,
Daud, A.R.
,
Surinah, A.
,
Noorhaida, U.
,
Shaharom, N.
and
Rahim, A.
(2009), “Health preparedness and response to flood disaster in Johore, Malaysia: challenges and lessons learned”, Malaysian Journal of Community Health Public, Vol. 15, Supplement, pp. 126-131.
Cited by
42 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|