The role of the spouse in managers’ family-related career sensemaking
Author:
Lysova Evgenia I.,Korotov Konstantin,Khapova Svetlana N.,Jansen Paul G. W.
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to contribute to a growing body of literature on the role of family in managers’ career decision making. Specifically, the authors offer an empirical elaboration on a recently proposed concept of the “family-relatedness of work decisions” (FRWD) by illuminating the role of the spouse in managers’ career sensemaking.
Design/methodology/approach
– In total, 88 managers who were in the final stage of their EMBA program took part in the study. The data were gathered through a personal career inventory.
Findings
– The findings revealed that next to family-career salience and parent role identification, spouses also play an important role in shaping managers’ family-related career sensemaking.
Research limitations/implications
– Future research should examine the supportive role of spouses in contexts other than that of an international EMBA. Moreover, researchers should examine the role of managers’ boundary management styles in shaping the degree of their family-related career sensemaking.
Practical implications
– The paper suggests that when designing and implementing developmental initiatives, organizations should consider that managers’ decisions about their next career steps may be guided by family-related concerns, and the spouse may play a specific role.
Originality/value
– This paper offers the first empirical exploration and a refinement of the nascent theory of the “FRWD.” It also introduces a new construct into the theory – spousal career support – that opens new avenues for future research.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference78 articles.
1. Adams, G.A.
,
King, L.A.
and
King, D.W.
(1996), “Relationships of job and family involvement, family social support, and work-family conflict with job and life satisfaction”,
Journal of Applied Psychology
, Vol. 81 No. 4, pp. 411-420. 2. Adams, J.S.
(1965), “Inequity in social exchange”, in
Berkowitz, L.
(Ed.),
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
, Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 267-299. 3. Albert, S.
,
Ashforth, B.E.
and
Dutton, J.E.
(2000), “Organizational identity and identification: charting new waters and building new bridges”,
Academy of Management Review
, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 13-17. 4. Altheide, D.
,
Coyle, M.
,
DeVriese, K.
and
Schneider, C.
(2008), “Emergent qualitative document analysis”, in
Hesse-Biber, S.N.
and
Leavy, P.
(Eds),
Handbook of Emergent Methods
, Guilford Press, New York, NY, pp. 127-151. 5. Altheide, D.L.
(1987), “Ethnographic content analysis”,
Qualitative Sociology
, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 65-77.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|