Institutional influences on women's representation on corporate boards

Author:

Sheridan Alison,Ross-Smith Anne,Lord Linley

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to interrogate changes to women's representation on boards from an institutional perspective in a particular national context (Australia). Design/methodology/approach – Drawing on institutional theory at the legal, political and social levels the paper identifies the factors through which women's underrepresentation on corporate boards in Australia gained traction over the period 2009-2012. Findings – Through the analysis of the Australian context over the period 2009-2012, the paper proposes a framework to represent the multiple, differentiated and often conflicting spheres affecting women's representation on boards and how this may have wider application internationally. Research limitations/implications – In focusing on the institutional factors, the paper does not mean to underplay organisational factors relevant to women's access to board positions; rather the authors seek to draw attention to how the organisational factors may be shaped by changing institutional “rules”. From the interrogation of the conditions under which women's underrepresentation on corporate boards in Australia gained traction, the paper provides a conceptual foundation for the emerging study of institutions and women's representation on corporate boards internationally. Practical implications – The purpose of documenting these institutional changes in Australia is to be instructive to others addressing the practical problem of how to increase women's representation on boards and what institutional factors may need to be considered to prompt change. Originality/value – The conceptual framework adds to the as yet relatively under-theorised field of women on corporate boards.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Cultural Studies,Gender Studies

Reference68 articles.

1. 30 Per Cent Club (2011), “International comparison”, London, available at: www.30percentclub.org.uk/research/international-comparison/ (accessed 17 July 2012).

2. Aguilera, R.V. and Jackson, G. (2003), “The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: dimensions and determinants”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 447-465.

3. Aguilera, R. , Dencker, J. and Yalabik, Z. (2008), “Institutions and organizational socialization: integrating employees in cross-border mergers and acquisitions”, in Lewin, A.Y. , Cavusgil, S.T. , Hult, G.T. M. and Griffith, D. (Eds), Thought Leadership in Advancing International Business Research, Palgrave, London, pp. 153-189.

4. Alvesson, M. and Due Billing, Y. (2002), “Beyond body counting: a discussion of the social construction of gender at work”, in Aaltio, I. and Mills, A. (Eds), Gender Identity and the Culture of Organizations, Routledge, London, pp. 72-91.

5. ASX Corporate Governance Council (2010), Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations, 2nd ed., Australian Securities Exchange, Sydney.

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3