Author:
Henrekson Magnus,Stenkula Mikael
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to show that entrepreneurship can be fruitfully analyzed by positing that entrepreneurs are searching for rates of return exceeding the risk-adjusted market rate of return, i.e., they try to create or discover economic rents.
Design/methodology/approach
A conceptual paper trying to bridge the gap between neoclassical economics and the entrepreneurship field by seeing entrepreneurship as the search for and creation of (entrepreneurial) rents.
Findings
In the short to medium term the search for and creation of entrepreneurial rents give rise to supernormal profits if successful. In the longer term these rents are dissipated and accrue to society at large as cheaper and better products. Entrepreneurial rents are crucial for bringing about the innovation and continuous structural change required to generate economic growth.
Practical implications
The search for entrepreneurial rents is crucial for economic development. Without the possibility to earn entrepreneurial rents, no entrepreneur would be willing to exercise entrepreneurship and exploit entrepreneurial opportunities. Successful entrepreneurship attracts imitating firms that push back profits to normal levels and the benefits of the innovation will be diffused to consumers.
Social implications
Understanding the role of entrepreneurship and its compensation is crucial for analyses of potential policy measures. High ex post compensation for successful entrepreneurship cannot be taxed harshly without affecting entrepreneurs’ willingness to supply effort.
Originality/value
The entrepreneurial function and its compensation are often neglected in neoclassical economics. This is a major shortcoming, as the presence of and search for entrepreneurial rents are necessary for bringing about the innovation and structural change that result in economic growth.
Reference33 articles.
1. Aghion, P., Akcigit, U., Bergeaud, A., Blundell, R. and Hémous, D. (2015), “Innovation and top income inequality”, Working Paper No. 21247, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
2. Competition and innovation: an inverted-U relationship;Quarterly Journal of Economics,2005
3. The effects of entry on incumbent innovation and productivity;Review of Economics and Statistics,2009
4. Aghion, P., Howitt, P. and Prantl, S. (2013), “Patent rights, product market reforms and innovation”, Working Paper No. 18554, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
5. Theories of entrepreneurship: alternative assumptions and the study of entrepreneurial action;Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship,2005
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献