Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to explain how abstract space of the State – universally and specifically within the context of Middle Eastern cities – aims to homogenise the city and eliminate any anomaly that threatens its power structure.
Design/methodology/approach
Through a historical and discourse analysis of these policies and processes in the two case studies, this paper presents a contextualised reading of Lefebvre’s concept of abstract space and process of abstraction in relation to the alienation of political public spaces.
Findings
The paper proposes that regardless of these homogenising strategies being applied universally, they fail to respond to contextual particularities and therefore they – in a contradictory manner – may themselves produce a space of resistance and difference.
Originality/value
This paper focusses on Iran, the case of Tehran and Turkey, the case of Taksim Square and Gezi Park in Istanbul. Recent policies and strategies have been proposed and implemented to reduce, alienate and possibly neutralise the impacts of urban and political protests in these cities and socio-political contexts.
Subject
Urban Studies,Architecture
Reference72 articles.
1. Post January Revolution Cairo: urban wars and the reshaping of public space;Theory, Culture and Society,2014
2. Abrahamian, E. (2010), “I am not a speck of dirt, I am a retired teacher”, in Hashemi, N. and Pastel, D. (Eds), The People Reloaded: the Green Movement and the Struggle for Iran’s Future, Melville House, New York, NY, pp. 60-71.
3. Aksoy, A. (2017), “What emerged in the Gezi Park occupation in Istanbul?”, in Hemer, O. and Persson, H.-Å. (Eds), In the Aftermath of Gezi, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 17-34.
4. Violence, resistance, and Gezi Park;International Journal of Middle East Studies,2013
5. Bazaar-mosque alliance: the social basis of revolts and revolutions;International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society,1988
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献