Business students’ perceptions of faculty evaluations

Author:

Ahmadi Mohammad,Helms Marilyn M.,Raiszadeh Farhad

Abstract

Students are asked to evaluate faculty on a continual basis at most universities throughout the world, yet students have varying perceptions about the purpose and usefulness of these evaluations. While research has focused on the faculty issues regarding evaluations and their use in subsequent evaluation, yearly reviews, tenure decisions, and even post‐tenure review, little research has been conducted to evaluate student feelings on the evaluations. In a case study format, a random sample of College of Business Administration students from freshman to EMBA levels was polled about their perceptions of the student ratings of faculty. The results provide interesting insights into their perceptions as well as constructive ideas on how better to administer the evaluations and publish the results. Results can benefit not only business schools but also other colleges in improving the evaluation process and linking the results to other rewards and faculty improvement mechanisms.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education

Reference38 articles.

1. Abrami, P.C et al. (1980), “Do teacher standards for assigning grades affect student evaluations of instruction?”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 72, pp. 107‐18.

2. Armstrong, J.S. (1998), “Are student ratings of instruction useful?”, American Psychologist, Vol. 53 No. 11, pp. 1223‐4.

3. Baba, V.V. and Ace, M.E. (1989), “Serendipity in leadership, initiating structure and consideration in the classroom”, Human Relations, Vol. 42, pp. 509‐25.

4. Bachen, C.M. et al. (1999), “Assessing the role of gender in college students’ evaluations of faculty”, Communication Education, Vol. 48, pp. 193‐210.

5. Basow, S.A. and Silberg, N.T. (1987), “Student evaluation of college professors: are female and male professors rated differently?”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 79 No. 3, pp. 308‐14.

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3