Development of multiple thinking and creativity in organizational learning

Author:

Cheong Cheng Yin

Abstract

PurposeBased on a typology of contextualized multiple thinking, this paper aims to elaborate how the levels of thinking (data, information, knowledge, and intelligence), and the types of thinking as a whole, can be used to profile the characteristics of multiple thinking in organizational learning, re‐conceptualize the nature of creativity in organizational action and thinking, and provide a new systematic framework to broaden the possibilities and approaches to developing multiple thinking and creativity in organizational action and learning in education and other sectors.Design/methodology/approachThe paper presents a theoretical framework of multiple thinking and creativity in organizational learning.FindingsBased on the typology of contextualized multiple thinking, a new theoretical framework can be proposed to facilitate understanding and development of multiple thinking and creativity in organizational learning and to enhance the effectiveness of action of individuals and organizations in education and other sectors in a complicated context.Originality/valueThe theoretical framework provides a new direction and new strategies for conceptualizing research, development and practice, designed to promote thinking, creativity and effectiveness in organizational action and learning in education and other sectors in a new era of globalization and great transformation.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education

Reference58 articles.

1. Al‐Hawamdeh, S. and Hart, T.L. (2002), Information and Knowledge Society, McGraw‐Hill, Singapore.

2. Andriopoulos, C. (2001), “Determinants of organizational creativity: a literature review”, Management Decision, Vol. 39 No. 10, pp. 834‐40.

3. Argyris, C. (1982), Reasoning, Learning and Action, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA.

4. Argyris, C. and Schön, D.A. (1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.

5. Ball, S.J. (1987), The Micro‐politics of the School: Towards a Theory of School Organization, Routledge, London.

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3