Author:
Bennett Roger,Mousley Wendy,Ali‐Choudhury Rehnuma
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this research is to examine the influences of certain factors that helped determine students' assessments of the usefulness of a higher education orientation unit (HEOU) in a large post‐1992 university.Design/methodology/approachAll students in a university business studies department who had completed or were near to completing a compulsory one‐semester HEOU were asked to fill in a questionnaire that explored specific personal characteristics that a review of prior academic literature had identified as potentially relevant to the explanation of how well or badly students respond to a HEOU. The outcomes were then related to the participants' views on the overall value of the unit and whether their attendance had led to improved academic performance.FindingsStudents who claimed that they had obtained the greatest advantages from the HEOU tended to be “academic” individuals who were highly committed to being a student, intrinsically motivated to study, high in academic self‐concept, academically able, and prior to their entry to the institution had been well‐prepared for university life. This was not necessarily the profile of the students that the unit had been designed to assist.Research limitations/implicationsData on key variables was (necessarily) self‐reported. The investigation took place in a single institution and in a particular subject area. Also the students who filled in the questionnaire were, ipso facto, “survivors” and as such may not have been typical of students who had dropped out.Practical implicationsThe outcomes to the study imply that “one size fits all” approaches to the design of study skills units might not be appropriate. Rather, specially constructed units may be needed to cater for the academically ill‐prepared.Originality/valueAt the time the research was conducted this was the first major empirical study to have related students' perceptions of the usefulness of an HEOU to their backgrounds, traits, and other personal characteristics.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education
Reference77 articles.
1. Abouserie, R. (1994), “Sources and levels of stress in relation to locus of control and self‐esteem in university students”, Educational Psychology, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 323‐30.
2. Archer, L. (2002), “A question of motives”, Times Higher Education Supplement, 31 May, p. 14.
3. Beder, S. (1997), University discussion paper, available at: http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au/Articles/dec97/beder1.htm.
4. Bennett, R. (2004), “Students' motives for enrolling on business degrees in a post‐1992 university”, International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 25‐36.
5. Bennett, R. and Barkensjo, A. (2005), “Characteristics of academically excellent business studies students in a post‐1992 university”, Research in Post‐Compulsory Education, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 5‐25.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献