Author:
Cornes Isabel Clare,Cook Brian
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to provide empirical insights into urban household perceptions and (in)action towards the perceived impacts of climate change, based on a case study in Kensington, Victoria, Australia. This case utilises households as sites of active agency, rather than as passive recipients of climate change or associated governance.
Design/methodology/approach
This research trialled an approach to engaging a community in the context of disaster risk reduction (DRR). It involved a two-stage quantitative door-knocking survey (reported elsewhere), followed by a qualitative interview with interested households. In total, 76 quantitative surveys contextualise 15 qualitative interviews, which are the focus of this analysis. The findings are presented comparatively alongside the current literature.
Findings
Heatwaves are understood to be the most concerning hazard for the households in this sample who associate their increasing frequency and severity with climate change. However, subsequent (in)action is shown to be situated within the complexities of day-to-day activities and concerns. While respondents did not consider themselves to have “expert” knowledge on climate change, or consider their actions to be a direct response to climate change, most had undertaken actions resulting from experience with heatwaves. These findings suggest there may be an under-representation of DRR, which includes climate change adaptation actions, within the existing research.
Research limitations/implications
While this sample justifies the arguments and conclusions, it is not a representative sample and therefore requires follow-up. It does however challenge traditional approaches to risk management, which focus on awareness raising and education. The research highlights the unique contexts in which households perceive and act on risk, and the need for risk “experts” to consider such contexts.
Originality/value
This research provides empirical evidence of urban household responses to perceived climate change-related risk, an often-neglected dimension of heatwave and adaptation studies in Australia. The findings also suggest promise for the methodological approach.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Health (social science)
Reference73 articles.
1. Four reasons for concern about adaptation to climate change;Environmental Planning A,2009
2. Climate change, community understanding and emotional responses to the impacts of heat waves in Adelaide;The International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses,2013
3. A ladder of citizen participation;Journal of the American Institute of Planners,1969
4. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2017), “2016 Census Quickstats: Kensington (Vic)”, available at: www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2016/quickstat/SS C21319?opendocument (accessed 20 October, 2017).
5. Urban policy and governance in a global environment: complex systems, scale mismatches and public participation;Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,2010
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献